Dental implant Dental implant
Conditions
Interventions
One routine visit will take place where the following parameters will be assessed: patient satisfaction measured by two short questionnaires, implant survival and success, clinical parameters measured
Sponsors
Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Previously included in one of the initial studies (Jonker et al., 2018; Jonker et al., 2020).
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: No placement of a final implant supported crown has taken place yet.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Patient reported outcomes using a visual analog scale (VAS) scored questionnaire (score 0-10) and the validated questionnaire Orofacial Esthetic Score (OES-NL) - Satisfaction with general dentition - Impact of the surgery - Pain - Swelling - Satisfaction with the crown - Satisfaction with the soft tissue- Satisfaction with overall appearance with regard to the face, dentition, mouth (OES-NL) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Clinical outcomes using a periodontal probe- Implant survival and success (Albrektsson et al., 1986; Buser et al., 1990; Karoussis et al., 2004)- Plaque index (PI) (Mombelli et al., 1987)- Bleeding index (BI) (Muhlemann & Son, 1971)- Gingiva index (GI) (Loe & Silness, 1963)- Pocket probing depth (PPD)- Keratinized mucosa width (KMW) (Cox & Zarb, 1987)Esthetic outcomes using a digital photograph - Pink esthetic score (PES) - White esthetic score (WES)Radiographic outcomes measured using an intra-oral radiograph - Marginal bone level | — |
Countries
Netherlands
Contacts
Public ContactA Jue
Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Outcome results
None listed