Skip to content

PERSEUS-I

Percutaneous versus EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic fluid collections after left pancreatectomy (PERSEUS-I): an international randomized controlled trial. - PERcutaneous versuS EUS-guided drainage of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections after left pancreatectomies (PERSEUS-I)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON61373
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-08-13
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complication: Postoperative (peri)pancreatic fluid collections, symptomatic fluid collection(s), Postoperative pancreatic fistula, Postoperative pancreatic fistula collection. Surgery type: left pancreatectomy, distal pancreatectomy, pancreatic tail resection. Complication: Pancreatic fluid pockets, fluid collections near the pancreas, digestive gland fluid collection. Surgery: digestive gland surgery

Interventions

Comparison between percutaneous drainage with an external drain versus EUS-guided drainage with plastic stent placement.

Sponsors

Amsterdam UMC
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: =18 yearsSymptomatic fluid collection following a left pancreatectomy, with an indication for drainage according to the treatment team. Indications for drainage exists of: Symptoms of abdominal pain and/or persistent nausea.  Suspected infection/ sepsis. Fluid collection drainage is endoscopically and percutaneously feasible, preferably judged by the expert panel, to ensure the possibility that participants can be randomized between both treatment modalities. No contraindications for either procedure. If the contraindication can be overcome safely, such as ascites for which prior abdominal drainage is needed, the patient can still be included. No prior drainage attempts for the fluid collection. In case of a previously intraoperatively placed drain, it should have been removed 5 days prior to fluid collection development. 

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: <18 yearsThe fluid collection is not endoscopically or percutaneously feasible per the expert panel’s judgement or the treatment team in acute situations.Prior drainage attempts of the fluid collection.Received an indwelling percutaneous drain intraoperatively. Intraoperatively placed drains are only permitted when at least removed 5 days prior to development of the fluid collection.Unable to obtain informed consent by either patient or their legal representative. Permanently incapacitated research participants.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is safety by day 30 after index procedure, defined as absence of procedure related adverse-events. The co-primary endpoint is quality of life at 30 days, and is additionally measured in intervals until day 90 after index procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoints include and are not limited to: hospital stay duration, feasibility of intervention within 48 hours, reintervention rate and mortality.

Countries

Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, United States

Contacts

Public ContactR.P. Voermans

Amsterdam UMC

secretariaatmdl@amsterdamumc.nl0204441125

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026