Skip to content

CPR video decision aid: Does an informative animated video help in choosing whether or not to opt for CPR?

The Use of an Informative Video on CPR and Code Status as a Decision Aid Tool for Patients Admitted to the Hospital: A Pilot Study - CPR Video Decision Aid

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON58609
Enrollment
72
Registered
2026-01-28
Start date
2026-08-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Choosing resuscitation status, CPR status CPR choice

Interventions

First, a control group will receive standard care, i.e., the standard code discussion. Subsequently, an intervention group will be enrolled, in which patients will view an animated informative video (

Sponsors

Spaarne Gasthuis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: To be eligible to participate in this study, a patient must meet all of the following criteria: (1) currently present in the emergency department, not in acute life-threatening condition, and clinically stable; (2) has been assessed at the emergency department and deemed to require hospital admission; (3) required to make a decision on a resuscitation code (Code 0, 1, 2); (4) speak and understand Dutch; and (5) is 18 years or older.Recruited healthcare professionals must meet the following: (1) treating a patient who received the video intervention; and physicians specifically must meet the additional criteria: (2) conducted the resuscitation discussion with the patient who received the video intervention.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A patient who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: (1) cognitive impaired (e.g., dementia or current mental health disorders); (2) those in acute distress requiring acute medical care (or immediate resuscitation decisions); (3) patients for whom a palliative plan (Code 3) is/will be determined; or (4) visually and/or audibly impaired.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the primary outcome of this pilot study is Acceptability, which will assess how well the intervention is received by the patients and healthcare professionals, and will help determine whether the video is seen as a useful, comfortable, and non-intimidating addition to the standard code status discussion process.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary outcomes are Fidelity, Adoption, Appropriateness, and Feasibility. Two innovation outcomes are added, namely PerceivedAdded Value and Selected Resuscitation Code.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactA in de Braekt

Spaarne Gasthuis

wetenschapsbureau@spaarnegasthuis.nl0232241644

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026