Skip to content

POM protheses

Cobalt-Chromium versus PolyOxyMethylene Removable Partial Dentures: A Within-Subject Comparison Study - Cobalt-Chromium versus PolyOxyMethylene Removable Partial Dentures: A Within-Subject Comparison Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON58530
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-01-15
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Missing teeth, prosthesis Missing teeth, prosthesis

Interventions

Placement of a newly fabricated POM removable partial denture, compared with the patient’s existing CR-CO removable partial denture.

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a potential participant must meet all of the following criteria:Age =18 years.Mentally competent and able to provide written informed consent.Cognitively able to complete  questionnaires.Wearing  Co–Cr removable partial denture on daily basisClassified as ASA physical status I, II or III.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A potential participant who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: -  ASA physical status IV.-  Active periodontal disease or untreated caries.-  Mental incapacity, dementia, or any other cognitive impairment that prevents valid assessment and/or informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction; will be scored before during and after the course of the study. A questionnaire on items such as maintenance, colour, comfort, retention will asses patient satisfaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient-reported outcome (oral health related quality of Life): Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14 NL) scores to identify the impact of the prosthetic appliance on the oral healt-related quality of life. Functional outcome: Masticatory efficiency assessed by standardized chewing tests. Clinical outcome: Number of repairs and maintenance requirements during long term follow-up. Patient preference: Selection of either the Co-Cr or the POM framework denture for continued use after the trial period based on parameters such as experienced comfort, retention, ease of cleaning, aesthetics etc.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactE.E. Baran

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen

m.c.f.m.de.kuijper@umcg.nl0503616271

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026