Acquired Brain Injury with complex additional (behavioural) problems (ABI+) Brain Injury with additional complex behaviour
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Client is labeled as ABI+; Participants are members of the Dutch ABI+ Expert Network; Case is regarded by healthcare professionals as a case representing the dilemma between the use of involuntary care and enchancing self-determination of the client; Case is recent; Informed consent by the client or the representative of the client has been received for participation to the study or discussing the case.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Client is not labeled as ABI+ or is part of a different Low-Volume High Complex (LVHC) population; Participant or organisation is not a member of the Dutch ABI+ Expert Network; Case took place over a year ago; Participant is not directly involved in care provided to the ABI+ client; No informed consent has been provided by the client or their representative for participation in the study or discussing the case.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The results are categorized using Self-Determination Theory. This theory states that three basic needs must be fulfilled for a person to experience a sense of self-determination: competence, autonomy, and relatedness. Observations and statements from clients, relatives and care professionals are analyzed to determine whether they relate to one of these three needs. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Aside from the effects of involuntary care on the needs of clients with ABI+, care professionals from organisations that are a member of the Dutch ABI+ Expert Network will be asked how their organisation views the use of involuntary care and what protocols, interventions or methods are in place to prevent or reduce the use of involuntary care. | — |
Countries
Netherlands
Contacts
Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum