Skip to content

MONTE study 1

Pilot study on the feasibility of the methodology for a future prospective evaluation of safety and clinical benefits of the MONTE monitor, for the management of intracranial hypertension in patients with traumatic brain injury - MONTE study 1

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON58135
Enrollment
12
Registered
2024-04-25
Start date
2026-04-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury

Interventions

study includes patients with severe traumatic&nbsp
brain injury (TBI) and invasive intraparenchymal&nbsp
intracranial pressure monitoring&nbsp
(ICP)&nbsp
aged&nbsp
18&nbsp
years&nbsp
or&nbsp
older&nbsp
who&nbsp
are&nbsp
admitted&nbsp
Intensive&nbsp
Unit&nbsp

Sponsors

Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients (age 18 years or older) Severe traumatic brain injuryContinuous invasive intraparenchymal intracranial pressure monitoringPatient requires sedation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orderBilateral dilated pupils or absence of pupil reflection PregnancyKnown pre-existing neurocognitive disorders or brain dysfunctionsKnown pre-existing spinal-cord injuries with loss of motor-functionPrimary decompressive craniectomy 

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint will be the assessment of the feasibility of the proposed methodology. Feasibility aims at assessing the following:Evaluating study feasibility and deciding upon research methods.Evaluating the feasibility of the technical set-up of the study.Estimating the time and costs required for the project.Evaluating the randomization procedure.Feasibility will be quantified with the following measures:Main feasibility endpoint: Adherence to the CIPThe adherence to the number of clinical evaluations is equal or higher than 75%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary feasibility endpoints: Adherence to the CIP and technical feasibilityThe number of performed clinical evaluations without technical problems is equal or higher than 90%.Estimate of the costs and time required for an interventional study that is powered for safety and clinical benefits (effectiveness). Evaluate the validity of the randomizationprocedure.Estimate of the recruitment rates, drop-out rate and incidence of ICU-mortality. Insights on the true effect of the intervention.Assessing the understanding of the study questionnaires.In view of a future interventional study, during the pilot study potential future endpoints for safety and clinical benefits (effectiveness) will be collected and analysed. We report below the list of additional collected endpoints, “s" indicates an endpoint that will evaluate safety, while “e" indicates an endpoint that will evaluate effectiveness.ICU-mortality (“s",”e")number of events of harmful ICPdoses (“e")percentage of time with harmful ICP doses (“e”)number of events of extremelyelevated ICP (defined as ICP>28mmHg for more than 10 minutes) (“e") percentage of time with impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation ("e")duration of sedation (“e”)percentage of patients that underwent Tier 3 therapies (decompressive craniectomy, hypotherm

Countries

Belgium, Italy, Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactCWE Hoedemaekers

Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum

astrid.hoedemaekers@radboudumc.nl0031243617273

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 16, 2026