Skip to content

Research on treatment of a completely obstructed coronary artery with an inflatable drug-coated balloon versus implantation of stents

Drug-Coated Balloon Coronary Angioplasty versus Complete Stenting for Treatment of a Chronic Total Occlusion: The Co-CTO 2.0 study - Drug-Coated Balloon Coronary Angioplasty versus Complete Stenting for Treatment of a Chronic Total Occlusion

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON58053
Enrollment
150
Registered
2025-02-19
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion (CTO) Chronically Occluded Coronary

Interventions

The Drug-Coated Balloon (Agent, Boston Scientific Inc.).

Sponsors

Amsterdam UMC
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age = 18 yearsClinical indication for revascularization of the CTO as determined by the local heart team (based on symptoms, documented ischemia, and viability)Successful recanalization of the CTO lesion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Unfavorable characteristics for DCB-angioplasty, including: dissection affecting the flow ([TIMI]  score<3), significant recoil (>30%) or coronary perforation following predilationReference diameter of the vessel is <2.5 mm or >4.0 mmBifurcation lesion requiring the stenting of the side branchPrior extensive stent-placement (presence of a continuous segment of intracoronary stenting >60 mm or ‘full metal jacket’)Left main lesionAcute coronary syndromeCardiogenic shockSevere kidney disease defined as an eGFR < 30 ml/minPregnancyLife expectancy < 12 monthsInability to give written consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is late luminal loss at 1 year follow up, as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary invasive imaging parameters include percentage diameter stenosis, minimal lumen diameter, in-segment binary restenosis, and target vessel re-occlusion at 1-year follow-up. Secondary clinical objectives are evaluation of the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1-year follow-up.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactYBO Somsen

Amsterdam UMC

y.somsen@amsterdamumc.nl020 444 3272

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)