Skip to content

CANOPIN study

Safety & Performance of CANOpus PINtuition Surgical Marker Navigation (CANOPIN Study) - CANOPIN study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON57884
Enrollment
35
Registered
2025-02-19
Start date
2025-09-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast sparing surgery

Interventions

The investigational device is the Sirius Canopus Marker, which is similar to the CE-marked Sirius Pintuition Marker with two tiny anchors added to it for improved tissue fixation. The marker will be i

Sponsors

Sirius Medical Systems B.V.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent for the investigation 2. Subject is at least 18 years of age 3. Subject is diagnosed with a single, pathologically confirmed unifocal breast tumour (DCIS or invasive) 4. Tumour is ultrasound visible 5. Subject is indicated for primary breast conserving surgery and/or targeted axillary dissection 6. Subject is indicated for preoperative localization using a single marker in the primary breast lesion and/or a single marker in an axillary lymph node

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subject is lactating or pregnant 2. Subject is expected to have surgery scheduled more than 6 weeks after implantation of the Canopus Marker. 3. Subject has an ICD or other active implant such as a pacemaker less than 5 cm away from the intended target location(s) 4. Subject has a proven infection or hematoma at or close to the intended target location(s) 5. Subject is expected to require an MRI scan in the period between implantation and surgery 6. Known hypersensitivity to Titanium or Nickel

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Primary Performance Endpoint is successful retrieval rate of Canopus Markers that were correctly placed, as documented by imaging. 

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary Performance Endpoints and Hypotheses:1) An overall radiologist satisfaction score of =7 measured on a 10-point Likert scale or comparable index. 2) An overall surgical satisfaction score of =7 measured on a 10-point Likert scale or comparable index. 3) An overall subject satisfaction score of =3 measured on a 5-point Likert scale or comparable index. Safety Endpoints and Hypothesis:The primary safety endpoint and hypothesis is no investigational device-related serious adverse device effects (SADEs) through study completion in any subject.Secondary safety endpoints include the reporting of the incidence, severity and causal relationship of adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), unanticipated serious adverse device events (USADEs) and device deficiencies (DDs) in accordance with ISO 14155:2020 definitions

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactK. Kempen

Sirius Medical Systems B.V.

info@sirius-medical.com085 773 2727

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026