Skip to content

The added value of 3D electroanatomical mapping for accurate delivery of pulse field ablation in the treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

The Added Value of three-dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping For Accurate Delivery Of Pulsed Field Ablation In The Pulmonary Veins Compared To Pulsed Field Ablation With Fluoroscopy And/Or Intracardiac Echocardiography Alone In The Treatment Of Atrial Fibrillation: MAP-PFA study - Additional visualization using Electroanatomical Mapping improves the centricity of Pulmonary Veins Antral Ablation Lesions

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON57850
Enrollment
32
Registered
2025-03-10
Start date
2025-09-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Interventions

The FARAPULSE™ pulsed field ablation system is the first PFA ablation system available for commercial use in clinical practice. The system consists of a generator, over-the-wire multipolar catheter, a
The FARAVIEW mapping system operates in integration with FARAPULSE/FARAWAVE PFA catheter, where the mapping data (includes e.g. voltage values, local activation time, impedance measurements, etc) are
Both trial’s groups will be provided with the current standard of care for Atrial Fibrillation ablation using the FARAVIEW and FARAWAVE catheter. The FARAWAVE catheter is in use in Europe and UMCG sin

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Age > 18 years old. -Diagnosed with Atrial Fibrillation. -Planned for ablation with Pulsed Field ablation technology. -Able to consent for participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of prior Atrial Fibrillation ablation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Eccentricity index comparison between both study groups using the FARAVIEW versus FARAWAVE systems.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
-Number of additional “touch-up” ablations needed after the conclusion of the initial ablation in both groups post post-ablation mapping during the same procedure.  -Procedure time

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactYB Blaauw

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen

y.blaauw01@umcg.nl0503616161

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026