Skip to content

Comparison of *lesion by lesion* and field photodynamic therapy in the prevention of actinic keratoses: a randomised, split face, single blind pilot study

Comparison of *lesion by lesion* and field photodynamic therapy in the prevention of actinic keratoses: a randomised, split face, single blind pilot study - Study on lesional vs field photodynamic therapie in actinic keratoses

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON57756
Enrollment
30
Registered
2012-03-01
Start date
2011-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

actinic keratosis solar keratoses

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Sint Radboud
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Age 18 years or above -Male and female -At least 5 up to 10 grade I or II AK lesions, in each of two symmetrical 50 cm2 contralateral areas, on the face or scalp, symmetrically distributed (number and severity) -Willingly to sign a written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Invasive SCC, AK grade III or other tumours than AK in the area to be treated -Known allergy to MAL or related compounds, or excipients of the cream -Participation in other clinical studies in the last 30 days -Other treatments for skin cancer in the area to be treated in the last 30 days -Likelihood of noncompliance -Chronic immunosuppression -Pregnant or breast-feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary Objective: • Relapse rate of AK and incidence of new lesions at 9 months after PDT treatment • Time for new lesions to develop

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary Objective(s): • Number of new lesions at 3 months and 6 months post treatment • Percentage reduction of AK from baseline at 3 months and 6 months post-treatment • At 3 months, patient side response will be categorised in one of the following categories: o Complete response: 100% of lesions within a patient-side assessed as CR o Excellent response: 75%-99% of lesions within a patient-side assessed as CR o Fair response: 50%-74% of lesions within a patient-side assessed as CR o Poor response: 25%-49 % of AK lesions within a patient-side assessed as CR o No response: 0%-24 % of AK lesions within a patient-side assessed as CR

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)