Skip to content

Sacral Nerve Modulation in Multiple Screlosis

Sacral Nerve Modulation as a Treatment for Voiding Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis Patients - Sacral Nerve Modulation in Multiple Screlosis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON57554
Enrollment
18
Registered
2024-04-11
Start date
2026-01-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

MS, urinary tract complaints MS, voiding complaints

Interventions

Sacral Neuromodulator is a surgical technique in which an electrode is placed&nbsp
adjacent to the sacral nerves. An electrical current is generated by an&nbsp
implanted pulse generator (IPG) and stimulates sacral nerves, usually the&nbsp
third, which modulates bladder function. Not all patients are responders to SNM&nbsp
and for this reason the implantation of a definitive SNM is preceded by a test&nbsp
phase. This procedure is called Peripheral Nerve Evaluation (PNE) which happens&nbsp
in two stages. It can be done either with a PNE test wire or with the final&nbsp
electrode with the Tined Lead, also known as a Tined Lead Procedure (TLP). In&nbsp
this study we will use the TLP which will be performed under general&nbsp
anaesthesia. Lead placement and acute phase The first phase is the acute phase which happens under local or general&nbsp
anaesthesia and we look for an appropriate motor response. Local differences in&nbsp
anaesthesia technique are allowed. A needle is used to puncture the skin and&nbsp
fascia overlying the parasacral muscles which are also punctured. The third&nbsp
sacral foramen is visualised using X-ray and is subsequently punctured in order&nbsp
to stimulate S3. By external electrical stimulation motor reactions like&nbsp
contraction of the pelvic floor and the flexion of the hallux can be observed.&nbsp
When an insufficient reaction of S3 stimulation is obtained, the contralateral&nbsp
S3 foramen is tried in order to have the best response. If this fails the S4&nbsp
foramina can be tried. After identifying a motor response a stylet reassures&nbsp
the position while the needle is removed. Subsequently an introducer sheath is&nbsp

Sponsors

Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum +
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria: 1. Diagnosis of Multiple sclerosis according to the McDonald criteria with its latest revision in 2017. 2. Stable Relapsing-remitting MS 3. Storage LUTD with Urgency Frequency (UF) or Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) 4. Insufficient treatment with conventional therapy such as lifestyle changes, anticholinergics and/or beta-3 agonists or catheterisation or patients with side effects of these treatments. 5. Frequency: Urgency Frequency (UF) >=9 times a day (average of 3 day Voiding Diary) or Incontinence: at least 1 UUI episode a day (average of 3 day voiding Diary) 6. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ranging from 0 to 6 7. Age > 18 years 8. Patients must have an adequate motor response during tined lead placement and placement of a unilateral electrode 9. Willing to fill out voiding diaries and questionnaires at different time points throughout the study 10. Willing to comply to the study protocol, sign the informed consent form and travel to the institution for follow up visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded  from participation in this study: 1. Any other form of MS (Primary progressive or secondary progressive) 2. EDSS >6.0 3. Evidence of increasing disease disability or an MS relapse in the last 6  month or more than 1.0 point EDSS deterioration in the preceding 12 months 4. Changes in immunomodulation medication in the past 3 months 5. Having newly diagnosed MS lesions on the last MRI-scan (within 12 months of  inclusion) when comparing to the previous scan. If the MRI is older than 12  months and the patient is clinically stable, they can be included 6. Post-void residual > 150 ml and unwilling to perform Clean Intermittent  Self-Catheterisation (CISC) 7. Treatment with intravesical Botulinum toxin injections in the past 9 month  prior to study inclusion 8. Other urological diseases such as bladder or kidney stones, persistent or  recurrent Urinary Tract Disease, upper urinary tract deterioration, prostate  obstruction, urethral stricture, pelvic pains or pelvic cancer 9. A history of other illnesses causing bladder dysfunction such as spinal cord  injury, cauda equine compression, cerebral ischemic attack etcetera in the  preceding 12 months 10. Severe and uncontrolled diabetes; or diabetes with peripheral nerve  involvement. 11. Moderate to severe ureteral reflux or moderate to severe hydronephrosis 12. Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI). Upon completion of therapy for  UTI, or if the patient is receiving prophylactics for UTI, patients can be  considered for implant 13. History of SNM therapy trial or implantation 14. Primary diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence, determined by symptom  assessment and physical examination, or mixed urinary incontinence in which the  stress component is more profound 15. Mental disorders which could lead to a disturbance in filling out diaries  or questionnaires as determined by the investigator 16. Pregnancy 17. Patient is not willing to undergo a wash out period for medication or  percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation treating overactive bladder symptoms  18. Patient is currently participating in or planning on participating in  another clinical trial that is subjected to the CTR or MDR

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The first primary study parameter will be the difference between groups when comparing the percentage of responders at 3 months (IPG ON group vs IPG OFF group), defined as a decrease in symptom severity of at least 50% compared to baseline in the primary symptom (urge, frequency or leaks). This percentage is calculated by comparison of voiding diaries. The second primary study parameter is the safety of the device evaluated through adverse events (number of infections, urinary tract infections, lead breakage or displacement, explantations, etc) at 3 and 12 months, and by assessing EDSS difference from baseline between groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Percentage of responders - Individual response of urinary frequency (voids/day) - Individual response of urgency urinary incontinence (leaks/day) - Need for CIC (CIC/day) - Wexner Scale difference - Patient outcome measurement all expressed in numeric values: SF-Qualiveen, ICIQ-FLUTS, ICIQ-FLUTSsex, ICIQ-MLUTS, ICIQ-MLUTSsex, FIQL, PGI-I

Countries

Belgium, Netherlands, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactJ.F. Timmermans

Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum +

secretariaat.urologie@mumc.nl043-3875255

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026