Skip to content

Ageinglines: Unraveling the biological mechanisms of ageing

Ageinglines: Unraveling the biological mechanisms of ageing - Ageinglines

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON57431
Enrollment
4500
Registered
2025-03-31
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia frailty

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
65 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Age between 65 and 80 years during the comprehensive examination at the research site - Written informed consent - Access to internet at home to fill in online questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - No consent of the participant to inform General Practitioner in case of abnormal results are found during the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main study parameter is frailty according to the deficit accumulation model of Rockwood. This model postulates that the proportion of ageing-related health deficits, i.e. the Frailty Index (FI), reflects biological age over chronological age. For the construction of the Frailty Index (FI), we will follow the guidelines of Searle and colleagues by including health deficits on the following frailty dimensions: physical frailty, cognitive frailty, emotional frailty, sensory frailty, metabolic frailty and social frailty. Each of these health deficits can be characterize as biologically meaningful in representing multiple organ systems and accumulate with age. Each deficit was coded as 0 (absence) or 1 (presence) or when clinically relevant, as any number between 0 and 1. The frailty score will be calculated for each individual by dividing the sum of health deficits scores by the number of health deficits measured. This will result in a score between 0 (no deficits present) and 1 (all deficits present). The higher the deficit count, the frailer and more vulnerable individuals are to adverse outcomes. For clinical interpretation, people can be classified as robust (FI =0.25).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The following secondary parameters will be included: 1. Physical functioning a. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) consisting of balance, gait speed (4 meter), and 5 chair stand up test b. Physical activity and gait speed measured with a accelerometer (MOX1 Activity Logger; Maastricht Instruments BV, Netherlands, CE certified) c. Grip strength (maximum grip strength measured at both arms 3 times with 20 sec rest intervals using Jamar handdynamometer) d. Sarcopenia (SARC-F questionnaire) e. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL questionnaire of Lawton) f. Activities of Daily Living (ADL Katz questionnaire) 2. Mental functioning a. Depressive symptoms (CES-D questionnaire) b. Loneliness (De Jong-Gierveld questionnaire) 3. Cognitive functioning a. Stroop task b. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) c. 15-Word Verbal Learning Test 4. Well-being a. Well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale)

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026