Skip to content

Neurophysiological effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in persons with MS - a pilot study

Neurophysiological effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in persons with MS - a pilot study - fMRI-TENS

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON57305
Enrollment
45
Registered
2024-06-12
Start date
2025-10-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

MS Multiple Sclerosis MS

Interventions

Active or sham TENS either in rest or in combination with foot movements.

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - age: 18-65 years - EDSS score

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - metal or electrical implants - BMI > 40 - claustrophobia - being pregnant - having a psychiatric disorder - having cognitive or communication problems which reduces the capacity to understand instructions - having a neurological disorder other than MS - having cardiac arrhythmia - having a pacemaker or another implantable electronic apparatus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) activation changes and the interaction networks before, during and after active TENS and differences in activation due to active stimulation vs. sham stimulation and active stimulation on tibialis anterior vs active stimulation combined with plantar/dorsiflexion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in brain activity and the interaction networks focussing on the thalamus (integration station of sensory input), sensory cortex (sensory awareness) and motor cortices (sensorimotor integration) before, during and after active stimulation of the quadriceps femoris vs. tibialis anterior, active stimulation of the tibialis anterior vs. plantar/dorsiflexion, sham stimulation of the tibialis anterior vs. sham stimulation combined with plantar/dorsiflexion and active stimulation in pwMS vs. active stimulation in controls.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactN Dreijer

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen

n.dreijer@umcg.nl0625647172

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026