Skip to content

Effectiveness of Small Size Interarcuair Decompression versus Extended Decompression in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication (SIZE-study): a multi-centre, double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness of Small Size Interarcuair Decompression versus Extended Decompression in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication (SIZE-study): a multi-centre, double-blinded randomized controlled trial - SIZE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON57263
Enrollment
174
Registered
2019-04-02
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

lumbar spinal stenosis narrowing of spinal canal

Interventions

All surgeons involved with the Size-study are highly experienced in both interventions. Both techniques are part of the Dutch training program for neurosurgeons. The intervention that is to be inve

Sponsors

Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - At least 12 weeks of complaints of Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication - Indication for an operation - Magnetic Resonance Imaging demonstrating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - Age above 40 years - Sufficient knowledge of the Dutch language in order comprehend the questionnaires and patient information. - Written informed consent given

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - History of lumbar surgery - More than 2 lumbar levels operation or needed discectomy - Degenerative spondylolisthesis greater than grade I (on a scale of I to IV) - Scoliosis or disc herniation - Severe comorbid medical disorder (American Society of Anesthesiologists > 3) - Serious psychopathologic disorder - Pregnancy - Active malignancy - Plans to move abroad during study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
5.1.1 Main study parameter/endpoint The primary outcome measurement will be the Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (MRMDQ). This is a 24-point Dutch questionnaire that is designed to assess the physical disability in patients, due to lower back pain. The participant will complete the questionnaire and the sum of the scores reflects the invalidity in daily life. The score can vary from 0 (no restriction) to 24 (severe limitations). s

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Numeric Rating Scale for leg and back pain The pain intensity in both legs (affected and non-affected) and back will be rated on an 11-point scale. A score of 0 represents *no pain*, while a score of 10 represents *the most terrible pain I can imagine*. The outcome is the average pain intensity in the legs and back. During each visit the participants are asked to rate the pain for both legs and one for back pain, if applicable. The patient is not entitled to see the pain score indicated during previous visit(s). Physical examination consisting of: - Neurologic examination A straight leg raise test will be performed. Furthermore, strength, sensibility and reflexes will be assessed of the lower extremity. - Timed-up and go test The TUG test will be performed in a standardized manner On *Go,* the patient gets up and walks as fast as possible (no running) to a marked line on the floor at a distance of 3*m. On the line, they turn around by 180° and return to the chair and sit down as quickly as possible. The time between getting up and sitting down again will be recorded in seconds using a stopwatch. The patients are allowed to wear their regular shoes and use a walking aid, if required. Raw TUG test times will be transformed into T-scores using age- and sex-adjusted norms. The TUG app is validated for disc but not for stenosis yet and will be conducted in this study. - 6-minute walk test (6MinWT) The 6 -minute walk test is performed to assess the gait pattern, walking speed and physical endurance of patients. The test will be executed on a ground level, where the walked distance can easily be measured, f.i. in a hall with adequate walking space. The patient will be requested to walk at such a speed that at the end of the 6 minutes, the patient will have the feeling of maximum output. At the end of the 6 minutes, the distance will be measured. During the walking test, the patient is permitted to use a walking aid and/or an orthosis. - Timed

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)