Skip to content

Objectifying a patient*s perception of TKA instability using fluoroscopy during stair descent

Objectifying a patient*s perception of TKA instability using fluoroscopy during stair descent - OBJECTIFY

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON57102
Enrollment
36
Registered
2024-07-31
Start date
2025-05-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

joint replacement total knee replacement

Interventions

n.a.

Sponsors

Sint Maartenskliniek
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects who have a primary Genesis PS TKA systemSubjects in the cases-group should be up for a revision with the main reason  being instability. This is defined as the indication for the revision as  determined by the surgeon. To establish this diagnosis, infection (according to  the ICM 2018 criteria), loosening, and patellar problems have been excluded.  Although no clear and absolute definitions for malposition exist, it could be  the cause of instability. However, the treating surgeon will decide which of  the two complications is the main reason for revision. Patients with  malposition and major deviation in alignment will not be included in the study. Subjects in the cases-group should be self-reported unstable, as  defined as scoring either 1 or 2 points  on questions 7, 10, and 12 of the Oxford knee score, which we deem  important questions for people  suffering from instability issues with their TKA.Subjects in the cases-group should not have had a previous minor revision with insert exchange meant to resolve the instability. Subjects falling in the control-group should have a good outcome of their  TKA, as defined by having an  Oxford Knee Score of above 30 and score at least 3 points on questions  7, 10, and 12, which we deem  important questions for people suffering from instability issues with  their TKA.Subjects who are in the age range of 40 to 85 years (both inclusive)Subjects who did not have had any previous surgery to their knee which could  restrict their range of  motionSubjects who are at least two years post-operativeSubjects who can perform the requested activities safelySubjects who are willing to participate in this study and are willing to sign  appropriate informed consent  forms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Female patients who are pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or lactatingPatients who have enrolled in a fluoroscopic kinematic study within the past  yearPatients with neurological or musculoskeletal disorders that might adversely  affect weight-bearing motion abilityPatients whose body size exceeds the limits that can be accommodated by the  equipment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main study parameters are the AP translation of the femoral condyles (in mm) and rotation of the femur component (in degrees) with respect to the tibia component during stair descent as measured on fluoroscopic images.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
In addition, alignment, functional tests, objective laxity tests performed with radiographs, acceleration of the femur and tibia during stair descent obtained using intertial measurement units, and PROMS are investigated to see if they have a relation with the perceived instability of the patient and/or the movement patterns of the femur component with respect to the tibia component during the stair descent activity.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactT Droogsma

Sint Maartenskliniek

t.droogsma@maartenskliniek.nl024 365 9140

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)