Skip to content

Implementation of intrapartum non-invasive electrophysiological monitoring

Implementation of intrapartum non-invasive electrophysiological monitoring - NIEM-II study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON56299
Enrollment
5571
Registered
2022-10-17
Start date
2023-11-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Maternal and perinatal outcomes Outcomes mother and child

Interventions

Eligible women will be prospectively included in the cohort receiving conventional CTG monitoring. From the eligible women in the prospective cohort a random sample (90.9%) will be offered eCTG moni

Sponsors

Máxima MC
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria: - Minimal age of 18 years old - Pregnant women with a gestational age between 37+0 and 42+0 weeks and days - Indication for fetal monitoring during labour - Singleton fetus in cephalic position - Oral and written informed consent is obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded  from participation in this study: - Insufficient knowledge of Dutch or English language - Women with a multiple pregnancy - Fetal and/or maternal cardiac arrhythmias  - Contraindications to abdominal patch placement (dermatologic diseases of the  abdomen  precluding preparation of the abdomen with abrasive paper) - Women connected to an external or implanted electrical stimulator, such as pacemaker (because of disturbance  of the  electrophysiological signal) - Treatment plan (with intervention plan) already made before inclusion is  completed - Women who were included in the study, but when circumstances before  labour call for delivery of the baby by unplanned caesarean section - There is insufficient time for proper counselling - Women admitted with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis with hypotension  (i.e. septic shock)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of operative interventions during labour; caesarean section or instrumental vaginal deliveries.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary objectives: eCTG compared with conventional CTG monitoring: - To assess the duration of the first stage of labour in minutes. - To assess the duration of the second stage of labour in minutes. - To assess the timing and reason of operative interventions during labour. - To assess the need of analgesia for pain reduction. - To assess perineal laceration and the use of episiotomy. - To assess how often FBS is performed during labour and the result of the FBS. - To assess neonatal and maternal mortality and morbidity. - To assess patient and health care professional satisfaction by questionnaires. - The total costs during labour until six weeks postpartum. For eCTG monitoring: - To assess the amount of signal loss. - To assess the frequency (percentage) of switch from the abdominal electrode patch to the conventional system (i.e. doppler ultrasound or fetal scalp electrode with tocodynamometry) during labour, along with the reason and timing of switches and the success rate before and after the switch. - To assess the EHG pattern and the amount of blood loss within the first 1.5 hour postpartum. - To assess EHG pattern in relation to medication use and placental expulsion (during 1.5 hour postpartum). - To assess EHG pattern before and after labour analgesia and the possible association of EHG pattern with labour analgesia.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactA Barschot

Máxima MC

NIEMIIstudie@mmc.nl040 – 888 83 80

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 22, 2026