Skip to content

Transoral robot surgery of the tongue base vs. Continuous positive airway pressure or mandibular advancement device as a treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea.

Transoral robot surgery of the tongue base vs. Continuous positive airway pressure or mandibular advancement device as a treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. - RAPID

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON56291
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-09-27
Start date
2024-07-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

obstructieve slaap apneu obstructive sleep apnea sleep disorder

Interventions

Group 1 will contain 25 patients that will receive TORS as treatment of OSA. Group 2 will contain 25 patients that will receive standard treatment via CPAP or MAD depending on what patient and physi

Sponsors

Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Participant has to be 18 years or older. - Participant should understand study protocol. - Apnea hypopnea index (AHI) during polysomnography (PSG) equal to 15 or higher. - During physical examination tongue tonsil of Friedman grade 3 or 4. - During sleep endoscopy collaps of tongue base level grade 2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - BMI of 32 or higher. - During sleep endoscopy concentric collaps. - Symptoms of central sleep apnea syndrome (CSAS). - Participants with ASA score of 4. - Excessive use of opiates and benzodiazepines. - History of treatment with CPAP or not tolerating of MAD.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure is a PSG measurement, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) at 6 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secundary study parameters: • To establish whether TORS long term outcomes of 12 months are superior to CPAP and MAD in terms of AHI. • To compare other outcomes of the PSG such as ODI 4% at 6 and 12 months in TORS and CPAP/MAD patients. • To compare functional outcome of sleep after TORS to CPAP and MAD through ESS questionnaire at 12 months. • To evaluate surgical complications after TORS. • To evaluate health related quality of life in TORS group versus CPAP/MAD group via FOSQ, EQ-5D-5L and GBI questionnaires. • To assess costs of TORS and CPAP and MAD treatment. • To assess CPAP and MAD compliance via read out of CPAP and consultations via pulmonologist and maxilla facial oral surgeon. • To systematically measure and analyse relevant surgical parameters such as operative time, length of hospital stay and to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of TORS and thereby optimizing surgical practices. • To assess post-operative pain levels after TORS via VAS pain scores at baseline, after surgery, day 1, day 3 or 4 and the day of discharge. • To assess swallowing quality after TORS via VAS scores for swallowing, swallowing questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months and via assessment by language speech pathologist at baseline, 2 days post-surgery and 6 weeks. • To determine differences in VAS scores for snoring, tiredness and globus at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months between TORS group and CPAP/MAD group. • To establish baseline descriptive characteristics and variables of the study population in terms of findings during ENT examination, BMI, history of smoking and reflux.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026