A randomised clinical study on indirect lithium disilicate versus direct composite restorations in severely compromised endodontically treated molar teeth

A randomised clinical study on indirect lithium disilicate versus direct composite restorations in severely compromised endodontically treated molar teeth - Direct versus indirect endocrowns

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON55487

Enrollment

102

Registered

2015-10-07

Start date

2015-11-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

tandheelkunde, herstel kiezen heavily filled endodontically treated molars

Interventions

The patient will be allocated at random to a direct or indirect endocrown. Direct endocrowns will be fabricated in one session using composite. During the indirect procedure, a preparation will be m

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient should be over 18 years of age; ASA-score I or II (de Jong, 1994). This ASA score is already known before participation, due to regular check-ups; Asymptomatic endodontically treated and heavily restored upper and lower molar teeth with an indication for a (new) restoration; Patients should have given written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA-score III or higher; symptomatic endodontically treated molars.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Complete failure.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Quality of survival.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)