Skip to content

HOVON 132 AML / SAKK 30/13, Randomized study with a run-in dose-selection phase to assess the added value of Lenalidomide in combination with standard remission-induction chemotherapy and post-remission treatment in patients aged 18-65 years with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high risk myelodysplasia (MDS) (IPSS-R risk score >4.5)

HOVON 132 AML / SAKK 30/13, Randomized study with a run-in dose-selection phase to assess the added value of Lenalidomide in combination with standard remission-induction chemotherapy and post-remission treatment in patients aged 18-65 years with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high risk myelodysplasia (MDS) (IPSS-R risk score >4.5) - HOVON 132 AML/ SAKK 30/13

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON55471
Enrollment
395
Registered
2013-11-13
Start date
2014-04-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Myelodysplasia

Interventions

First, we will establish in a randomized run-in study the dose level of&nbsp
lenalidomide in addition to the standard induction treatment of&nbsp
idarubicin/cytarabine (cycle I) and daunorubicine/cytarabine (cycle II) (part&nbsp
A-run-in).&nbsp
Following the dose-selection phase the study will continue as a randomized&nbsp
study for induction therapy (part A).&nbsp
Subsequently, we will also investigate the effect of lenalidomide maintenance&nbsp
treatment (10 mg/day) by randomization to be administered in first CR.

Sponsors

HOVON
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Part A: 1. Age 18-65 years, inclusive  2. Patients with  - a diagnosis of AML and related precursor neoplasms according to WHO 2008  classification (excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia) including secondary AML  (after an antecedent hematological disease (e.g. MDS) and therapy-related AML),  or - acute leukemia*s of ambiguous lineage according to WHO 2008 or - a diagnosis of refractory anemia with excess of blasts (MDS) and IPSS-R score  > 4.5 3. WHO performance status 0, 1 or 2  4. Sampled bone marrow and/ blood cells for centralized molecular analysis and  MRD evaluation, unless in case of a dry marrow tap with no possibility to  collect marrow cells. In cases of marrow tap failure only blood cells will be  sampled 5. Adequate renal and hepatic functions as indicated by the following  laboratory values:  - Serum creatinine <=1.0 mg/dL (<=88.7 µmol/L); if serum creatinine >1.0 mg/dL  (>88.7 µmol/L), then the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) must be >60  mL/min/1.73 m^2 as calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease  equation where Predicted GFR (ml/min/1.73 m^2) = 186 x (Serum Creatinine in  mg/dL)-1.154 x (age in years)-0.203 x (0.742 if patient is female) x (1.212 if  patient is black)  NOTE: if serum creatinine is measured in umol/L, recalculate it in mg/dL  according to the equation: 1 mg/dL = 88.7 umol/L) and use above mentioned  formula. - Serum bilirubin <=2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) - Aspartate transaminase (AST) <= 2.5 x ULN - Alanine transaminase (ALT) <= 2.5 x ULN - Alkaline phosphatase <= 2.5 x ULN 6. Written informed consent  7. Ability and willingness to adhere to the lenalidomide Pregnancy Prevention  Program, Part B: 1. CR or CRi 2. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >= 1.5 x 10^9/L 3. Platelet count >= 75 x 10^9/L 4. Serum creatinine clearance >= 30 ml/min or estimated glomerular filtration  rate (GFR) > 60mL/min/1.73^2 5. Total bilirubin <= 2.5 x ULN  6. AST <= 2.5 x ULN 7. ALT <= 2.5 x ULN

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Part A: 1. Previous therapy with lenalidomide 2. Acute promyelocytic leukemia 3. Previous treatment for AML or high risk MDS (IPSS-R > 4.5), except  hydroxyurea 4. Concurrent history of active malignancy in two past years prior to diagnosis  except for: - basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin - in situ carcinoma of the cervix 5. Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical condition (e.g. uncontrolled  diabetes, infection, hypertension, pulmonary disease etcetera) 6. Cardiac dysfunction as defined by: - Myocardial infarction within the last 6 months of study entry, or - Reduced left ventricular function with an ejection fraction < 50% as measured  by MUGA scan or echocardiogram or - Unstable angina, or - Unstable cardiac arrhythmias Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of the  drug product 7. Pregnant or lactating females 8. Unwilling or not capable to use effective means of birth control 9. Any psychological, familial, sociological and geographical condition  potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up  schedule, Part B: 1. Severe cardiac dysfunction (NYHA classification II-IV, see appendix G) 2. Severe pulmonary dysfunction (CTCAE grade III-IV, see appendix F) 3. Severe neurological or psychiatric disease 4. Serious active infections 5. Previous serious toxicities related to the use of lenalidomide  6. CMV reactivation, which is not responsive to first line valganciclovir

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary endpoint Part A-run-in: Lenalidomide dose level selection - DLT and duration of myelosuppression of induction treatment with or without lenalidomide for each of the distinct predefined dose levels Primary endpoint Part A: Induction - Efficacy - EFS after induction treatment with or without lenalidomide (i.e., time from registration to induction failure, death from any cause or relapse whichever occurs first) Primary endpoint Part B: Maintenance - Efficacy - Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) after second randomization (maintenance treatment with lenalidomide or observation only)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoints Part A Run-in : Lenalidomide dose level selection - Response (CR and CRi) after induction therapy cycles I and II Secondary endpoints Part A: Induction- Efficacy - EFS in the distinct prognostic subsets (AML good-risk vs. AML intermediate-risk vs. AML poor-risk vs. AML-very poor-risk) and cytogenetically and molecularly defined subgroups of AML - Response (CR and CRi) after induction therapy cycles I and II - Disease-free survival (DFS, measured from time of CR/CRi to day of relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurs first) - OS measured from the time of registration - Outcome of induction treatments in relation to MRD measurements -Evaluation of molecular prognostic markers and gene expression profiles for and overexpression of defined genes (e.g. EVI1, cereblon) for outcome in relation to induction and post induction treatments -Toxicities -Evaluation of MRD after induction and post-induction treatments -Time to hematopoietic recovery (ANC 0.5 and 1.0 x 10^9/L; platelets 50 and 100 x 10^9/L) after each treatment cycle -Number of platelet transfusions and last day of platelet transfusion after each cycle -Impact of the use of lenalidomide on the effectiveness of stem cell mobilization Secondary endpoints Part B: Maintenance - efficacy - OS and DFS measured from 2nd randomization, and also in the distinct prognostic subsets (AML good-risk vs. AML intermediate-risk vs. AML poor-risk vs. AML very poor-risk) and cytogenetically and molecularly defined subgroups of AML - Toxicities - Number of platelet transfusions and last day of platelet transfusion after each cycle - Number of RBC transfusions in relation to maintenance or no maintenance treatment - Evaluation of MRD after 2nd randomization - Time to hematopoietic recovery (ANC 0.5 and 1.0x10 ^ 9/L; platelets 50 and 100x10^9/L) after each treatment cycle

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)