Skip to content

Towards an optimal diagnostic work-up in patients suspected for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a diagnostic accuracy study

Towards an optimal diagnostic work-up in patients suspected for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a diagnostic accuracy study - Optimization of diagnostic accuracy in IIMs

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON55232
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-05-22
Start date
2020-06-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

muscle inflammation Myositis

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a patient must be adult (>=18 years of age) and suspected of an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy based on signs and symptoms. The latter include: • Symmetrical proximal muscle weakness causing functional limitation to justify treatment with corticosteroids, without significant sensory abnormalities. • Start of symptoms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Other clear cause for proximal muscle weakness, i.e. the use of myotoxic medication, high suspicion for an inflammatory neuropathy (CIDP) or a positive family history for a hereditary neuromuscular disease • A high suspicion for sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) based on clinical symptoms, including: combination of slow onset of asymmetrically, predominantly distal weakness, atrophy of quadriceps and forearms and age >50 years.3 • High suspicion on a neurogenic cause, based on more severe distal weakness than proximal weakness, asymmetric weakness, fasciculations in >1 region • No availability for follow-up of 6 months • Immunosuppressive treatment • Previous history of myositis • Contraindications for MRI, claustrophobia • No consent for muscle biopsy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic accuracy of various strategies, taking patient burden into account.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Costs of diagnostic tests in the respective testing strategies.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)