Feasibility of laser speckle contrast imaging using the bowel perfusion assessment tool Lapvas-Imaging

Feasibility of laser speckle contrast imaging using the bowel perfusion assessment tool Lapvas-Imaging - SCOUT-I

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON54884

Enrollment

Registered

2021-01-04

Start date

2021-02-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anastomotic leakage

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Confirmed diagnosis of colorectal cancer and are scheduled to undergo surgical resection (Hemicolectomy right, hemicolectomy left and sigmoid resection)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subtotal colectomy, abdominoperineal resection, temporary colostomy procedures, septic patients, non-elective surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
- The percentage of operating surgeons that indicated no change in location of the anastomosis based on the additional Lapvas-Imaging derived visual feedback; - The percentage of the non-involved surgeons that indicated no change in location of the anastomosis based on the additional Lapvas-Imaging derived visual feedback; - The proportion of the indication of a change in location by operating and non-involved surgeons between patients with and without AL; - The homogeneity of the change in location between non-involved surgeons for individual patients; - The estimated change in location of the anastomosis proximal/distal in centimeters by the treating surgeon; - The estimated change in location of the anastomosis proximal/distal in centimeters by non-involved surgeons;A change in the location of the anastomosis by non-involved surgeons in comparison to the operating surgeon); - Development of anastomotic leakage; - Extra time taken for imaging during surgery (seconds);	—

Measure

Time frame

- The percentage of operating surgeons that indicated no change in location of the anastomosis based on the additional Lapvas-Imaging derived visual feedback; - The percentage of the non-involved surgeons that indicated no change in location of the anastomosis based on the additional Lapvas-Imaging derived visual feedback; - The proportion of the indication of a change in location by operating and non-involved surgeons between patients with and without AL; - The homogeneity of the change in location between non-involved surgeons for individual patients; - The estimated change in location of the anastomosis proximal/distal in centimeters by the treating surgeon; - The estimated change in location of the anastomosis proximal/distal in centimeters by non-involved surgeons;A change in the location of the anastomosis by non-involved surgeons in comparison to the operating surgeon); - Development of anastomotic leakage; - Extra time taken for imaging during surgery (seconds);

—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results