Skip to content

Safety, longevity and patient satisfaction comparison of four hyaluronic acid soft tissue fillers in lip augmentation. A randomized, triple blind, controlled clinical trial.

Safety, longevity and patient satisfaction comparison of four hyaluronic acid soft tissue fillers in lip augmentation. A randomized, triple blind, controlled clinical trial. - Four lip fillers: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON54860
Enrollment
160
Registered
2021-05-25
Start date
2021-07-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cosmetische verfraaiing met het verbeteren van kwaliteit van leven als doel Cosmetic lip augmentation.

Interventions

The primary study treatment site will be the vermilion (body of the lip)
additional areas (vermilion borders, Cupid*s bow, philtral columns, and/or oral commissures) will be treated if deemed appropriate by the treating physician. Treatment will be administered through in

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria: • Age 18 years or over. • Female sex. • Oral and written informed consent to participate in the study. • Desire for cosmetic lip augmentation to improve one*s physical or mental well-being. • Actively treatment seeking (patient actively chooses to make an appointment at a Faceland private cosmetic clinic without invitation). • Small to moderately full lip volume (Merz Lip Scale score one to three out of four).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: • History of temporary of permanent filler treatment, or implant, in the lip. • Absolute contra-indications for HA filler treatment of the lip (Lafaille & Bernedetto, 2010; DeBoulle & Heydenrych, 2015). * Active peri-oral infection or inflammation in vicinity of injection site (e.g., acne or herpes) * Tumour in vincinity of injection site * Active tuberculosis * Pregnant or breast-feeding. * History of severe hypersensitivity to filler components (sodium hyaluronate preparations or local anesthetics of the -amide type) * History of allergy to gram-positive proteins * History of allergy to the hyaluronidase enzyme. * Active collagenosis (e.g., active systemic lupus) * Graft vs. host disease * Active Hashimoto*s disease * Use of thrombolytics or anticoagulants with high bleeding risk • Absolute contra-indications provided by the manufacturers * General infection * Porphyria * Untreated epilepsy * Keloid tendency * Cardiac arrythmia * Severe liver or kidney disease • Relative contra-indication for HA filler treatment of the lip. Fulfilling the DSM 5 diagnostic criteria for Body Dyspmorphic Disorder (APA, 2016). • The product will not be administered in combination with a peeling, laser treatment, or dermabrasion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine whether superiority can be shown of one or more HA soft tissue filler products over the others in longevity of the absolute lip volume augmentation, as measured by the Lemperle Lip Index from baseline to 3-months follow-up (Lemperle, Anderson, and Knapp 2010).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary objectives include; • To determine whether superiority can be shown of one or more HA soft tissue filler products over the others in safety, as measured by the relative incidence of side effects (as measured by the FACE-Q questionnaire *Recovery Early Symptoms* and *Adverse Effects: Lips*) and adverse events related to the procedure. • To determine whether superiority can be shown of one or more HA soft tissue filler products over the others in absolute lip volume augmentation as measured by the Lip Index from baseline to 3-weeks follow-up. • To determine whether superiority can be shown of one or more HA soft tissue filler products over the others in quality of life and satisfaction with the treatment as measured by validated FACE-Q questionnaire scores (*Decision*, *Outcome*, *Satisfaction with Lips*, *Early Life Impact*, *Social*, *Psychological*) from baseline to 3-months follow-up (Klassen et al. 2015).

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)