Skip to content

Single use vs reusable catheters in intermittent CatheterizatiOn for treatment of urinary retention: a Multicenter, Prospective, RandomizEd controlled, non-inferiority trial (COMPaRE)

Single use vs reusable catheters in intermittent CatheterizatiOn for treatment of urinary retention: a Multicenter, Prospective, RandomizEd controlled, non-inferiority trial (COMPaRE) - COMPaRE

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON54700
Enrollment
386
Registered
2019-03-05
Start date
2020-02-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

inability of bladder emptying Urinary retention

Interventions

&nbsp
Patients will be randomized into two groups, one group will use the single use&nbsp
catheters, the other group will start using the reusable catheter which will be&nbsp
renewed every two weeks.&nbsp

Sponsors

Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
16 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria:  In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all  of the following criteria:  - Male/Female patients >= 16 years old.  - Diagnosed with urinary retention or significant post-void residue due to  non-neurogenic or neurogenic causes.  - Expected chronic, but at least for a duration of twelve months, necessity for  daily drainage of the urinary bladder.  - Be able to administer self CIC via the urethra daily and have at least two  weeks of experience in CIC. 

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:  A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded  from participation in this study: - Age < 16 years. - Temporary use of  catheterization because of transient causes. - Known significant urethral  stricture which prevents CIC. - Urinary tract stones. - Bladder augmentation. -  Non-urethral catheterization. - History of bladder cancer with active  follow-up. - The use of immunosuppressives for transplantation or auto-immune  diseases. - Neurocognitive disease which prevents complete comprehension of the  study. 

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes will be other adverse events, like hospital stays due to UTIs, bladder stones and haematuria, and symptom specific and quality of life questionnaires. Quality of life will be measured by the following validated questionnaires: EQ-5D-5L and an adjusted (shortened) version of the ICIQ-UAB questionnaire. The ease of use of the catheters will be evaluated by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale, the ISCQ and the InCaSaQ. Cost-effectiveness calculation on both types of catheters will be made. The economic evaluation will be done using the iMCQ and iPCQ questionnaires. Two additional questions concerning patients thoughts on environmental burden and healthcare costs will be asked at week 0 and week 52.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactCHH Christiaans

Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam

c.christiaans@erasmusmc.nl0636466340

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026