Skip to content

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography First in Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. An Observational Two-Center Study

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography First in Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. An Observational Two-Center Study - CMR-CT-OBSERVE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON54580
Enrollment
127
Registered
2018-09-06
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

'Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Medisch Universitair Ziekenhuis Maastricht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Acute onset chest pain (or angina pectoris equivalent) suspected of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) • Hs-cTnT levels meeting the *observe* criteria (defined in the 2020 ESC Guidelines) • Hospital admission and scheduling for ICA (based on clinical judgement) • Age between 18 years - 85 years old • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Symptoms highly suggestive of non-cardiac origin at presentation (as judged by the cardiac ED physician/cardiologist) or highly suggestive of AAD, PE, or acute peri-myocarditis (unless this has been ruled out using additional diagnostic testing) • Suspected type II MI: e.g. secondary to anemia (<5.6 mmol/L), untreated hyperthyroidism, severe hypertension (>200/110 mmHg), moderate or severe mitral/aortic valve stenosis by latest echocardiography • Atrial fibrillation or ongoing tachycardia (>=100/bpm) • Safety: indication for urgent or immediate ICA: e.g. hemodynamic unstable patients, life threatening arrhythmias, ST-elevation MI, heart failure requiring intravenously medication, refractory angina or on-going severe ischemia • Logistics: Inability to organize CMR and CT early after admission (especially for patients admitted on Friday evenings/nights • History: prior CABG, recent PCI (<6 months), recent myocardial infarction (<6 months), or known CAD not suitable for further interventions (PCI or CABG) • Pregnancy or breast feeding women • Life expectancy <1 year (malignancy, etc.) • Contraindications to CMR or CT: o Metallic implant (vascular clip, neuro-stimulator, cochlear implant) o Pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) o Claustrophobia o Body weight >130 kg or BMI > 35 or body habitus that does not fit into the gantry o Renal failure (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1,73m2) o Known severe allergy to gadolinium or iodine contrast agents (patient with mild allergy is eligible for inclusion when pre-medication according to hospital guidelines can be administered) • Contraindications to adenosine: o High degree atrio-ventricular block (2nd or 3rd degree) o Severe bronchial asthma or recent exacerbation o Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD * III o Concomitant use of Dipyridamole (Persantin®) o Long QT syndrome (congenital) o Unable to refrain from caffeine >=12 hours prior to the examination

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is the sensitivity of CMR to detect obstructive CAD using ICA as gold standard in patients with suspected NSTEMI meeting the *observe* criteria and who are scheduled for ICA.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• The diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect obstructive CAD using ICA as gold standard • The diagnostic accuracy of CMR, CT and ICA to detect a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome and differentiate non coronary causes for elevated troponin • The true incidence of coronary, non-coronary and extracardiac pathology by a comprehensive (non-)invasive pathway • The association between CMR, CT and ICA findings, and MACE, a composite of MACE, and major non cardiac adverse events after 30 days and one year • The hypothetical cost-effectiveness of an early discharge strategy based on a CMR or CT first approach versus a routine invasive strategy • The clinical benefit of CMR and/or CT when added to the diagnostic process in finding the diagnosis and patient management • The ability of identifying the culprit coronary artery with CMR, CT and ICA • To correlation of quantitative perfusion methods: CMR perfusion vs CT perfusion (rest) vs CT-FFR vs intracoronary ICA measurements • To assess the clinical value of CT and/or CMR (eg. change in clinical diagnosis, indication for revascularization, patient management [medication])

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 9, 2026