Skip to content

Biological OviTex versus synthetic graft in robotic prolapse surgery: a multicentre, phase II-III, partially randomized patient preference trial

Biological OviTex versus synthetic graft in robotic prolapse surgery: a multicentre, phase II-III, partially randomized patient preference trial - ProTex

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON54397
Enrollment
184
Registered
2023-08-01
Start date
2023-12-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

intussusception Rectal prolapse

Interventions

The primary aim of this study is to compare prolapse surgery with OviTex instead of the current standard polypropylene mesh (Prolene, Ethocin Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Hamburg, Germany
weight 80-85 g/m2) in adult patients with a rectal prolapse and/or pelvic prolapse performed by experienced surgeons. Study participants will have 2 additional follow-up moments (each including the

Sponsors

Meander Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Indication for ventral mesh rectopexy with or without sacrocolpopexy Informed consent for OviTex or Polypropylene Age of 18 years or older Able to complete questionnaires and outpatient visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Mental incompetence Allergy to ovine rumen

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Study parameters/endpoints Main study parameter/endpoint phase II - Post-operative morbidity measured by reoperations, reinterventions, re-admissions, serious adverse events, Clavien Dindo classification and CTS classification. - The rate of rectal prolapse recurrence and complications (complaints, physical examination, addition research, re-operation and readmission). Main study parameter/endpoint phase III Constipation, incontinence and urogenital functioning (questionnaire, validated scoring system: Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), Altomare obstructive defecation score (ODS)) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary study parameters/endpoints - Quality of life (QoL) pre- and postoperatively objectified primarily by the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAC-QoL), Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL), Pelvic Floor impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) and European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D). - Post-operative morbidity measured by reoperations, reinterventions, re-admissions, and serious adverse advents. - Anatomic recurrence of the prolapse, measured by defecogram or MR defecography in rest and during Valsalva maneuver. - Rate of rectal prolapse recurrence and complications (complaints, physical examination, addition research, re-operation and readmission). - Anatomic recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) using the simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (sPOPQ) - Sexual functioning pre- and postoperatively by the questionnaire Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Inventory Questionnaire (PSIQ-12). - Length of hospital stay, peri-operative and post-operative in hospital mortality and morbidity. - Rate of extra outpatient visits because of complaints.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)