Skip to content

Comparing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation vs. Standard wound care to treat postoperative wound infections.

Comparing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation vs. Standard wound care to treat postoperative wound infections. - SCONE: Standard Wound care Compared to NPWTi Effectiveness

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON54383
Enrollment
446
Registered
2021-06-15
Start date
2021-10-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

inflammation wound infection

Interventions

NPWTi (after debridement if needed). The wound will be covered with an open-cell foam and an occlusive drape. During repeated cycles, the wound bed will be automatically soaked with 0.9% normal sali
cycle length depending on the bioburden of the wound. The foam and drape are changed every 2-3 days (1 treatment period). At least two treatment periods of 2-3 days need to be completed before swit

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In order to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria: • Age equal or older than 18 years; • A superficial or deep SSI plus a wound dehiscence (> 5 cm dehiscence) or a wound that needs to be opened for drainage of SSI after any type of surgery; • SSI occurring within 30 days after surgery; • A minimum wound size of 10 cm² to allow proper application of the study treatments; • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: • A deep organ/space SSI without a superficial (involvement of skin and fascia) wound infection • Psychically or mentally inability for informed consent • Fascial dehiscence > 0,5 cm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome: Time to complete wound healing defined as re-epithelization of the total wound surface or if the wound is ready for secondary surgical closure (i.e. healthy red granulation tissue without signs of infection or debris).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes: • pain (using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scored for the first two weeks daily; and during dressing changes for the first four weeks); • hospital length of stay (HLOS); • hospital readmissions (wound-related) (within 30 and 90 days after discharge); • frequency and type of surgical procedures related to SSI within 90 days post-operative; • health-related quality of life (using the EQ-5D-5L) at baseline; and after 30 & 90 days, 6 and 12 months after inclusion); • patient satisfaction (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0-10 score); • duration of total wound care, frequency of wound care (e.g., dressing changes) (during admission); • the need for homecare (and duration) for wound care after discharge from hospital; • costs (mean material costs per day; mean costs nursing time per dressing change based Dutch tariff; iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ); the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) at baseline and after 30 & 90 days, 6 and 12 months after inclusion; • professional satisfaction (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0-10 score). Additionally, three planned subgroup analysis of wound healing will be performed: (1) NPWT vs. conventional wound care within the standard care group; and (2) wound healing after secondary surgical closure vs. no secondary surgical closure; (3) foreign body-associated infections from implants of index operation vs. no foreign body-associated infections from implants of index operation.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026