Comparison between the multi-electrode Octaray and Pentaray catheters in patients undergoing ablation for atrial tachycardia using Coherent Mapping.

Comparison between the multi-electrode Octaray and Pentaray catheters in patients undergoing ablation for atrial tachycardia using Coherent Mapping. - OCTOPUS-AT

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON53474

Enrollment

Registered

2023-02-24

Start date

2023-05-10

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

atrial-flutter atrial-tachycardia

Interventions

Additional 3D Coherent map with Octaray catheter on top of the standard Coherent map with Pentaray catheter.

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients planned for ablation of atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals not able to provide informed consent for any reason including language and metal disabilities.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1) number of electrograms per map; 2) voltage-based signal to noise ratio per map.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1) electrograms acquisition rate per map; 2) electrogram acquisition density; 3) number of electrograms acquired per beat; 4) the total ablation and fluoroscopy times per group; 5) acute mapping success per group 6) number of entrainments attempted and best post-pacing interval value at ablation site per group, when available.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)