Skip to content

The effects of branch pulmonary artery stenting in d-TGA, ToF and TA: a randomized control trial

The effects of branch pulmonary artery stenting in d-TGA, ToF and TA: a randomized control trial - Effects branch PA stenting d-TGA, ToF and TA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON53404
Enrollment
56
Registered
2023-03-16
Start date
2024-04-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

narrowed pulmonary artery pulmonary artery stenosis

Interventions

During this trial, the intervention group will undergo a percutaneous intervention for branch PA stenosis. This is a standard treatment for branch PA stenosis according to international guidelines.

Sponsors

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
2 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria: • Patients with d-TGA post ASO, ToF or TA • >=8 years And one or more of the following inclusion criteria (Baumgartner et al. Eur Heart J 2021; Feltes et al. Circulation 2011; Tatewaki et al. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018): • All class IIa indications for a branch PA intervention: • Persistent decreased RV function (based on gold standard CMR) o =18 years RVEF=moderate) • Bifurcation stenosis o Significant unilateral stenosis (>=50%) o Borderline bilateral PA stenosis (40-70%) • Unbalanced perfusion ( 2/3 based on echocardiography • Reduced lung perfusion or decreased objective exercise capacity (based of gold standard VO2 max during CPET) o =18 years (Kaminsky et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2015) VO2 peak

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: • All class I indications for a branch PA stenosis intervention: o Doppler peak gradient >64 mmHg o Symptoms related to branch PA stenosis o R-L shunt via ASD or VSD o Recently developed decreased RV function • Physical or mental contraindications for at least one of the examinations (e.g. exercise test, MRI, QoL questionnaire)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The difference in VO2 max as parameter for exercise capacity between the interventional and control group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Technical success • Complications during the intervention • Complications after the intervention • Parameters for exercise capacity o Peak workload (W and % predicted) o O2 pulse (ml and % predicted) o VE/VCO2 slope • Parameters for RV systolic function o RVEF (%), measured via CMR o RV strain (%), measured via speckle tracking echocardiography and CMR feature tracking o RV fractional area change (FAC) (%) o RV pressure on echocardiography (TI gradient) • Parameters for RV contractility o RV end systolic elastance (Ees) measured via pressure volume loops o RV ESV (ml/m2) measured via dobutamine stress CMR o RVEF (%) measured via dobutamine stress CMR • Parameters for RV remodeling • Parameters for RV-PA coupling (invasive in intervention group) • Lung perfusion (%) measured via MRI o Left lung perfusion o Right lung perfusion • Quality of life

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)