Skip to content

Comparison of a solid state versus balloon esophageal catheter for estimation of pleural pressure in surgical ICU patients

Comparison of a solid state versus balloon esophageal catheter for estimation of pleural pressure in surgical ICU patients - Esophageal catheter validation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON53315
Enrollment
16
Registered
2023-04-28
Start date
2023-10-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

N/A

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Signed informed consent - Planned mechanical ventilation in the ICU following cardiothoracic or abdominal surgery - Age >= 18 year

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Pregnancy - Contraindications to esophageal catheter placement (e.g., upper airway/esophageal/mouth or face pathology (i.e. recent surgery, esophageal varices, diaphragmatic hernia) - Nasal bleeding within the last

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main study endpoint is the difference in Pes based derived parameters obtained by both types of esophageal catheters during controlled and assisted mechanical ventilation. Pes will be measured as absolute value and relative value. Absolute values are Pes values at end-expiration and at peak inspiration (based on flow recordings), relative Pes is the difference between both absolute values (Pes swings).

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)