Skip to content

Validation and implementation of the Comforthod-Knee System for accurate diagnosis of mechanical loosening and movement of a metal implant in the human body.

Validation and implementation of the Comforthod-Knee System for accurate diagnosis of mechanical loosening and movement of a metal implant in the human body. - Diagnosis of mechanical loosening using the Comforthod Knee System.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON52996
Enrollment
74
Registered
2015-04-07
Start date
2015-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knie prothese aseptic loosening mechanical loosening

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Patients diagnosed with aseptic loosening of the knee prosthesis and that are scheduled for revision surgery. - Patients with a TKA who are asymptomatic and have no complaints oftheir knee prosthesis. - Patients capable of giving informed consent and are willing to do this extra examination

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patients with another cause for revison surgery besides aseptic loosening. - Patients who are unable or unwilling to sign the informed consent for this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure of this study is the amount of movement of the prosthesis relative to adjacent bone. The amount of movement is expressed in movement in the screw axis, rotation of the prosthesis and movement in the x, y and z plane. These outcomes will be compared with the findings of the standard care pathway and the findings during revision surgery. The amount of movement of the prosthesis relative to the adjacent bone as measured in asymptomatic patients will be compared to amount of movement found by Comforthod system in patients were the TKA was found to be loose intra-operatively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome measure is the difference between the two groups in the amount of prosthesis movement with the adjacent bone. The amount of movement is expressed in movement in the screw axis, rotation of the prosthesis and movement in the x,y and z axis.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)