Skip to content

High Flow Nasal Cannula versus Low Flow Nasal Cannula in patienst with atrial fibrillation undergoing point-by-point catheter ablation under deep sedation.

High Flow Nasal Cannula versus Low Flow Nasal Cannula in patienst with atrial fibrillation undergoing point-by-point catheter ablation under deep sedation. - HFNC vs LFNC in patients with AF undergoing RFCA/ GPFA under deep sedation.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON52794
Enrollment
210
Registered
2020-12-24
Start date
2022-02-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oxygenatie tijdens diepe sedatie desaturation Hypoxemia

Interventions

One group receives HFNC and the other group receives LFNC.

Sponsors

Medisch Universitair Ziekenhuis Maastricht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults undergoing elective RFCA or Galaxy PFAfor atrial fibrillation in the Maastricht UMC Cardiac Catheter Labs under deep sedation administrated by a clinician anesthesiology.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age under 18 years Body Mass Index > 32 Diagnosed sleep apnoea syndrome Chronic pulmonary obstructive disease gold IV and COPD gold III with recent or frequent exacerbation Diagnosed pulmonary or cardiac condition requiring chronic oxygen therapy Complete nasale obstruction Active nose bleeding Untreated pneumothorax (pre- existing) Recent upper airway surgery Recent base of skull fracture Expected difficult airway.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Lowest saturation is the measured and main outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary objectives of the study are the duration of the lowest SpO2, incidence of cross over, incidence of desaturation, adverse sedation events, peak transcutaneous carbon dioxide (TcCO2), mean TcCO2, satisfaction of patients with sedation, patients comfort with oxygen delivery, rating of clinician of the anaesthesiology department of difficulty maintaining oxygenation status, rating of clinician anaesthesiology of user-friendliness of the oxygen delivery device and satisfaction of cardiologists with catheter stability in relation to sedation.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)