Skip to content

Medium and long term outcomes after modern radiotherapy for IDH mutated glioma

Medium and long term outcomes after modern radiotherapy for IDH mutated glioma - Radiotherapy in IDH mutated Glioma: Evaluation of Late outcomes (RIGEL)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON52769
Enrollment
79
Registered
2019-05-06
Start date
2019-12-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glioma IDH mutated. Glioma low grade (WHO 2) and anaplastic (WHO 3) brain tumor

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Age > 18 years - Resection (any grade) or biopsy of one of the following: glioma, WHO grade 2 or 3, IDH mutated - Indication and fit for standard treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy o For WHO grade 2 tumors 50.4 Gy (RBE) in 28 fractions. o For WHO grade 3 tumors 59.4 Gy (RBE) in 33 fractions. - Ability to comply with the protocol, including neuropsychological testing and imaging, as judged by the local investigator. - Ability to understand the requirements of the study and to give written informed consent. - Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Any prior cranial radiotherapy. - Prior or second invasive malignancy, except non-melanoma skin cancer, completely resected cervical or prostate cancer (with PSA of less than or equal to 0.1 ng/mL). - Extensive white matter disease visible on pre-therapy imaging (Fazekas grade >=2) - Contra-indication for MR imaging (i.e. metal implants, claustrophobia) - Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule in the participating hospitals - Any other serious medical condition that could interfere with follow-up. - Aphasia or language barrier interfering with endpoints and questionnaires (i.e. assessment of QoL, neurocognitive performance)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main study parameters/endpoints: • Next intervention free survival during follow-up. • Freedom of neuropsychological decline during follow-up, defined as a significant decline in performance in one of the following neuropsychological tests: Hopkins Verbal Learning test, Trail making test, Controlled Oral Word Association and Dutch Language Interoperative Protocol. • Toxicity evaluated with CTCAE - 5.0

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• MRI changes during follow up. • Quality of life, as measured by QLQ-C30, BN20 and EQ5D. • Health economics, as measured by the Productivity Cost Questionnaire and Medical Consumption Questionaire.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactA.M. Mendez Romero

Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam

a.mendezromero@erasmusmc.nl0107035829

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)