Skip to content

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Transmural Trauma Care Model (TTCM), a non randomized controlled multicenter trial

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Transmural Trauma Care Model (TTCM), a non randomized controlled multicenter trial - Transmural Trauma Care Model

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON52603
Enrollment
644
Registered
2019-10-01
Start date
2020-01-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

broken bone fracture

Interventions

In this project, pre- and in-hospital trauma care remains unchanged and is described in the LNAZ (Landelijk Netwerk Acute Zorg) recommendations [26]. The main aim of the TTCM is to improve trauma re

Sponsors

Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
16 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Age >= 16 years old • 1 or more fracture(s) as a result of a trauma • Able to fill in online questionnaires in Dutch • Able to give informed consent • At least one outpatient consultation of the trauma surgeon

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Patients with traumatic brain injury • Pathological fractures • Severe psychopathology (e.g. schizophrenia, high risk suicidality) • Cognitive limitations • Living in an institution (e.g. nursing home) • Does not speak/ understand Dutch

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Co-primary outcomes The co-primary outcomes are generic quality of life (EQ 5D-5L) and disease-specific quality of life (standardized Patient Reported Outcomes [PROMS]). Choice of measurement of dis-ease-specific quality of life depends on trauma location: - upper extremity: QuickDASH DLV - lower extremity: Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) - multiple fractures and/or more locations: Groningen activiteiten restrictie schaal (GARS) - back: The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Co-primary outcomes are measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
At baseline, relevant patient characteristics and important prognostic variables are measured (patient characteristics/ trauma characteristics). Secondary outcomes include functional status (Patient-Specific Functional Scale PSFS), pain (11-point NRS), patient satisfaction (11-point NRS), perceived recovery (7- point Global Per-ceived Effect Scale) and patient-reported health based on physical functioning (PROMIS-PF(-UE)). For the economic evaluation, societal and healthcare costs are measured. Sec-ondary outcomes are measured at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months. For the economic evaluation, societal as well as healthcare costs are assessed. Societal costs include all costs related to the TTCM, irrespective of who pays or benefits. Healthcare costs only include costs accruing to the formal Dutch healthcare sector. Intervention costs are micro-costed. Cost questionnaires based on the iMCQ (iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire), iPCQ (iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire), and WHO-HPQ (World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire) are administered at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months follow-up to collect data on healthcare utilization, the use of informal care, absenteeism, presenteeism and unpaid productivity losses [57]. Health care utilization includes the use of primary care (e.g. consultations at the general practitioner or physical therapist) and secondary care (e.g. consultations at the outpatient clinic for trauma patients, hospitalization) as well as the use of medication. Dutch standard costs are used to value healthcare costs [57]. Medication use is valued using the G-standard of the Dutch Society of Pharmacy [58]. Absenteeism is assessed by asking patients to report their total number of sick leave days [59]. Absenteeism is valued using gender-specific price weights [57]. Presenteeism is defined as reduced productivity while at work and is assessed using the WHO-HPQ [60]. Presenteeism is valued using ge

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)