Skip to content

Effect of Automated Closed-loop Ventilation versus Conventional Ventilation on Duration and Quality of Ventilation (*ACTiVE*) -a randomized clinical trial in intensive care unit patients

Effect of Automated Closed-loop Ventilation versus Conventional Ventilation on Duration and Quality of Ventilation (*ACTiVE*) -a randomized clinical trial in intensive care unit patients - ACTiVE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON52461
Enrollment
1040
Registered
2020-10-01
Start date
2020-10-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

respiratory insufficiency

Interventions

Patients randomized to the automated closed-loop ventilation-arm are ventilated with INTELLiVENT-ASV mode
patients randomized to the conventional ventilation-arm are ventilated with a non-automated mode of ventilation.

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Admission to an ICU participating in this trial - Need for invasive ventilation - An expected duration of ventilation > 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Age less than 18 years - Invasive ventilation longer than 1 hour in the intensive care unit before randomization - Invasive ventilation longer than 6 hours directly preceding intensive care unit admission - Patients who have recently undergone a pneumectomy or lobectomy - Patients with suspected or confirmed pregnancy - Patients with morbid obesity (body mass index > 40) - Patients with premorbid restrictive pulmonary disease (evidence of chronic interstitial infiltration on chest radiographs) - Patients in whom pulse oximetry is known to be unreliable (e.g., patients with carbon monoxide poisoning) - Patients with any neurologic diagnosis that can prolong duration of mechanical ventilation (e.g., patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome, high spinal cord lesion or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, or myasthenia gravis) - Patients receiving veno-venous, veno-arterial or arterio-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) - Previous randomization in this randomized controlled trial - Patients participating in another study with the same endpoint or interventions possibly comprising this study outcome - No informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days and alive at day 28 after ICU admission. The co-primary endpoint is the quality of breathing, defined as time spent within predefined zones of optimal ventilation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary study parameters include: - ICU length of stay - Hospital length of stay - 28-day mortality - 90-day mortality - Incidence of ICU mortality - Incidence of hospital mortality - Incidence of: development of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, severe atelectasis, pneumothorax, respiratory muscle weakness, severe hypoxemia and severe hypercapnia - Incidence of use of rescue therapies for severe hypoxemia or severe atelectasis (e.g. recruitment maneuver, prone positioning, bronchoscopy for opening atelectasis) - Quality of life at day 28

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)