Skip to content

Non-invasive brain stimulation as an innovative treatment for chronic neglect patients

Non-invasive brain stimulation as an innovative treatment for chronic neglect patients - Non-invasive brain stimulation in neglect / NibsNeglect

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON52429
Enrollment
22
Registered
2019-12-05
Start date
2020-10-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

obstruction of a bloodvessel or bleeding in the brain stroke

Interventions

We will combine an evidence based visual scanning training with 40 minutes of (active or sham) tACS at alpha frequency. The intervention is administered three times a week for a duration of six week

Sponsors

Universiteit Maastricht
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: * Stroke that occurred when subject was 18-80 years of age * Chronic stroke (>6 months post onset; first or recurrent, ischemic or intracerebral hemorrhagic lesion) * Diagnosed visuospatial neglect and/or spatial neglect symptoms (either left or right sided) * Sufficient comprehension and communication skills

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * Currently engaging in cognitive rehabilitation treatment or specific neglect treatment * Physically or mentally unable to participate (e.g. to perform the neglect training) * Hemianopsia * Severe communicative disability * Local scalp injuries * Eczema on scalp or psoriasis * (Neuro)psychiatric or neurodegenerative diseases including diagnosed epilepsy, dementia, serious depression, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson*s disease, Huntington*s disease on the basis of clinical judgement * Current alcohol and/or drug abuse * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Performance on standard, conventional neuropsychological tests, specifically tests to assess unilateral visuospatial neglect, as assessed prior to, during, and one week and three months after termination of the tACS intervention. The main study parameter is measured with a cancellation task. We are interested in the difference in attentional bias between the tACS group and the sham group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary objectives and outcomes: - To determine whether neglect training complemented with tACS treatment in chronic stroke patients suffering from neglect ameliorates neglect behavior in basic activities of daily living (ADL) to a larger extent compared to neglect training with sham stimulation. We administer additional tasks to assess neglect behavior in basic ADL, namely the Baking Tray Task, the Catherine Bergego Scale, and the Subjective Neglect Questionnaire. - To determine whether tACS delivered to the contralesional parietal cortex at alpha frequency, elevates the endogenous alpha power in parietal and parietal-occipital regions, compared to sham stimulation, in chronic stroke patients suffering from neglect. With electroencephalography (EEG) we measure the difference in power of alpha frequency band between baseline and the 1-week follow-up session, for tACS compared to control group.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)