Optimising recovery after cup revision or liner exchange- is the anterior approach superior to posterolateral?

Optimising recovery after cup revision or liner exchange- is the anterior approach superior to posterolateral? - Cuprevision or liner exchange approaches

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON52341

Enrollment

Registered

2021-12-13

Start date

2022-09-08

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

loosening/wear of acetabular cup or liner, revision of hip cup or liner

Interventions

In one group the anterior approach will be used, in the other group the posterolateral approach.

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Age >= 18 • On waiting list or scheduled for isolated cup revision surgery or liner exchange • A good command of the Dutch language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Revision for confirmed or suspected infection • Not suitable for both approaches under study, as judged by orthopaedic surgeon • Cognitive impairment • Unable to accurately follow instructions for study procedures / measurements, as judged by researcher and/or orthopaedic surgeon • Unwilling to sign informed consent form

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Difference in functional outcomes (30-second Chair Stand Test, 40m Fast Paced Walking Test, Stair Climb Test) between anterior and posterolateral approaches.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Modified Borg scale outcomes after functional tests, PROMS (NRS, Oxford Hip Score, HOOS-PS, EQ-5D-5L), inclination angle of the cup, complications at 30 days and 90 days after surgery.	—

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactB Hesseling

Reinier Haga Orthopedisch Centrum

Onderzoek@rhoc.nl079 206 5595

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)