Skip to content

Peri-operative (Continuous) Remote Patient Monitoring of Patients Undergoing Major Gastrointestinal Surgery: a Feasibility Study

Peri-operative (Continuous) Remote Patient Monitoring of Patients Undergoing Major Gastrointestinal Surgery: a Feasibility Study - Peri-operative Box

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON52280
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-06-20
Start date
2022-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract

Interventions

Patients who consent to take part in the study will receive a Healthdot device: a thorax-located patch which continuously monitors heart rate, respiratory rate, activity, and posture. The monitoring

Sponsors

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a) Age 18years and older; b) Admitted for major gastrointestinal surgery; c) Predicted hospital stay of >= 3 days; d) Elective surgery; e) Curative intended surgery; f) Basic understanding of smartphones and eHealth; g) Being in possession of a smartphone; h) Working Wifi-network at home or 4G-bundel.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a) Cognitive disorders; b) Not able to understand Dutch (written and/or verbally); c) Not able to work with eHealth and/or smartphones; d) Skin problems or wounds in the area of Healthdot; e) Known allergy for the adhesive used in the Healthdot; f) Palliative intended surgery or salvage surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine the feasibility (practical usability, technical, data quality) of perioperative (continuous) remote patient monitoring of patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To investigate (early) determinants (vital parameters, questionnaire answers) of postoperative complications 2. To compare the number of alarms in continuous remote patient monitoring and the number of alarms during the standard of care 3. To determine the usability and feasibility of a daily questionnaire to detect postoperative complications 4. To investigate patient satisfaction of care using (continuous) remote patient monitoring

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)