Skip to content

Comparison of two mandibular advancement devices in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients: a randomized crossover trial

Comparison of two mandibular advancement devices in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients: a randomized crossover trial - CONASO

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON52245
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-11-22
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Slaapstoornissen, slaapapneu OSA OSAS

Interventions

This study focuses on preference of OSA patients for one or another MAD type by comparing two different types of MADs in a randomized crossover design. The first type is the Narval CC® (ResMed, Lyon

Sponsors

Universiteit van Amsterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • 18 years or older; • Sufficient understanding of Dutch language in speaking, reading, and writing; • Ability to follow-up; • Ability to use a computer with internet connection for online questionnaires; • Diagnosis with symptomatic mild or moderate OSA (5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Reversible morphological upper airway abnormalities (e.g. enlarged tonsils); • Previous treatment with an MAD; • Inability to provide informed consent; • Simultaneous use of other modalities to treat OSA; • Known medical history of mental retardation, memory disorders, or psychiatric disorders; • Evidence of respiratory/sleep disorders other than OSA (e.g., central sleep apnea (CSA)); • Medication usage that has an effect on sleep; • Untreated periodontal problems, dental pain, and a lack of retention possibilities for both MADs; • Severe temporomandibular disorders (based on the function examination of the masticatory system).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The aim of this study is to compare the Narval CC® and the SomnoDent Flex® in a short-term and long-term follow-up. The primary outcome measures in the short-term and long-term follow-up are: Short-term follow-up: Primary outcome measure: 1. Preferred MAD: outcome based on a questionnaire on preference. Long-term follow-up: Primary outcome measure: 1. Mean disease alleviation: the product of sleep-time adjusted adherence (subjective oral appliance (OA) use/total sleep time, expressed in percentage) with therapeutic MAD efficacy (AHI baseline minus AHI with OA applied, expressed in percentage), divided by 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The aim of this study is to compare the Narval CC® and the SomnoDent Flex® in a short-term and long-term follow-up. The secondary outcome measures in the short-term and long-term follow-up are: Short-term follow-up: Secondary outcome measures: 1. Adherence: self-reported number of hours of wearing the MAD per total sleep time, in hours, *100%. 2. Therapy success: the number of patients with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)