Skip to content

Comparing effectiveness and safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation patients at high stroke risk unable to use oral anticoagulation therapy

Comparing effectiveness and safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation patients at high stroke risk unable to use oral anticoagulation therapy - COMPARE-LAAO

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON52211
Enrollment
609
Registered
2020-12-04
Start date
2021-01-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Afib Atrial fibrillation

Interventions

Percutaneous LAAO will be performed and afterwards patient will receive aspirin and clopidogrel for at least 45 days followed by aspirin up to 12 months. The control group may use APT agent(s) or no

Sponsors

Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Documented non-valvular AF (paroxysmal or non-paroxysmal) and 2. CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or more and 3. unsuitable for long-term use of oral anticoagulation as determined by the referring physician team as well as the multidisciplinary team in the study hospital and 4. suitable for dual ATP for at least 3 mo and single APT from 3 until at most 12 mo and 5. At least 18 years of age, and willing and able to provide informed consent and adhere to study rules and regulations and follow-up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. any invasive cardiac procedure within 30 days prior to randomization and 90 days after LAAO that would interfere with the study follow-up and medication 2. unsuitable LAA anatomy for closure or thrombus in the LAA at the time of procedure 3. contraindications or unfavourable conditions to perform cardiac catheterization or TEE 4. atrial septal malformations, atrial septal defect or a high-risk patient foramen ovale that may cause thrombo-embolic events 5. atrial septal defect repair or closure device or a patent foramen ovale repair or any other anatomical condition as this may preclude an LAAO procedure 6. LVEF50 mmHg) or regurgitation grade 3 or more 10. Planned cardiac surgery for any reason within 3 months 11. Stroke within the 3 months prior to inclusion 12. Major bleeding (BARC criteria>type 2) within 1 month prior to inclusion or longer if it has not been resolved yet 13. Compelling medical reason to use VKA or NOAC (e.g. mechanical heart valve, pulmonary embolism, ventricular aneurysm) 14. Major contraindications for using aspirin or clopidogrel 15. (planned) pregnancy 16. Participation in any other clinical trial that interferes with the current study 17. Life expectancy of less than 1 year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The 2 co-primary outcomes are time to first occurrence of stroke and/or stroke/TIA/systemic embolism. With a conservative relative risk reduction of 0.5, an endpoint driven trial aiming at 72 primary outcomes for stroke may achieve 85% power to show superiority of LAAO over not using oral anticoagulation within 5 years (Cox proportional hazards model, 2-sided testing, significance level of 5%).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes will include peri-procedural 30-day safety, QoL score at 1-yr, and cost-effectiveness analyses. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of LAAO against standard care will be performed from a societal perspective with 5 years and lifetime horizon. Outcome measures are the costs/yr free of cardiovascular event and cardio-embolic stroke, and per quality adjusted life year. The prevalent health care budget impact of LAAO diffusion will be assessed during the first 4 years after the study

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)