Skip to content

Follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer: the prospective, multicentre FUTURE-primary implementation study.

Follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer: the prospective, multicentre FUTURE-primary implementation study. - FUTURE-primary

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON52113
Enrollment
200
Registered
2021-08-23
Start date
2021-11-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

colon cancer Colorectal cancer

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Age >= 18 years • Histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis and treated with curative intent surgical resection less than 6 months ago • Scheduled or currently undergoing postoperative surveillance according to national guidelines

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Patients with a severely complicated postoperative course, needing in hospital follow-up longer than 6 months postoperatively • Patients enrolled in other studies that require strict adherence to any specific follow-up practice with regular imaging - yearly or more frequent - of the abdomen and/or thorax • Patients with comorbidity or other malignancy that requires imaging of the abdomen and/or thorax every year or more frequent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint of this study is a successful implementation of patient-led home based follow-up in patients under surveillance for CRC. Patient-led follow-up will be considered successful if the used optional follow up rate is below 75%. The rationale being that if more than 75% of the optional follow up moments are used, the added value of providing patients with a say in the frequency of their postoperative surveillance is minimal, as most will opt for the maximum frequency anyway.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoints of the study will be: * Successful implementation of home-based sampling by the patients themselves, defined as 25% or more of all scheduled or optional CEA assessments actually performed in blood collected by the patients themselves using the self-administered blood-sampling kit. * Quality of life: measured by the QLQ-C30 43,44 (Appendix D) * Health-related quality of life and the QLQ-CR29 45 (Appendix E) * Momentary quality of life: measured by ecological momentary assessment using the Global health status of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Appendix F) * Anxiety: measured by The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Six-Item Short-form (STAI-6) 46,47 (Appendix G) * Fear of cancer recurrence: measured by the Assessment of Survivor Concerns - Cancer Worry subscale (ASC-CW) 48 (Appendix H) * Cost-effectiveness: incremental costs and effectiveness will be determined: • Utility measure: EQ-5D-5L questionnaire 49 (Appendix I) • Intramural costs: assessed by review of patient records • Extramural costs: assessed by a selection of relevant questions from the Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) form the institute of Medical Technology Assessment.50 (Appendix J) o Questions 14, 15 and 18 - 31 are omitted from the original questionnaire. * Survival: both overall and cancer-specific, calculated from the date of surgical resection to the date of death or last follow-up. * Relation between coping style and follow-up preferences: measured by the Threatening Medical Situations Inventory (TMSI) (Appendix K) * Satisfaction of the patient-led home-based follow-up by a two-item questionnaire at the last follow-up (Appendix L)

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)