Skip to content

Ultrasound-based navigation during liver resection

Ultrasound-based navigation during liver resection - Ultrasound-based navigated liver resection

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON51512
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-07-28
Start date
2022-10-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

liver cancer

Interventions

The patient is operated on a surgical bed with a field generator positioned under the bed or near the head of the patient. The surgical procedure will start according to the standard practice. After

Sponsors

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Age >= 18 years - Patient provides written informed consent form - Patient is scheduled for liver resection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Ferro-magnetic implants in the abdominal or thoracic area that could influence electromagnetic tracking or the electromagnetic field - Pacemaker - Non-visible lesions on intraoperative ultrasound imaging

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main study endpoint is the feasibility of ultrasound-based navigation for assistance during hepatic resection. The navigational workflow is deemed feasible when 70% of the navigations are successful. A navigation is successful when instruments can be accurately shown with respect to the 3D model of the resection plane. This is measured by comparing the distance between the navigated pointer at the resection plane (shown by the navigation system) and that same distance measured by postoperative imaging of the resected specimen.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. The easiness of use during surgery using standardized System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaires amongst the surgeons, together with a questionnaire regarding expected effects on clinical outcome. 2. The time of all study-related actions during the surgery, such as tumour delineation and verification. 3. The difference between the planned resection margin and actual resection margin.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)