Skip to content

Spinal Cord Stimulation for intractable chronic lower abdominal neuropathic pain caused by endometriosis

Spinal Cord Stimulation for intractable chronic lower abdominal neuropathic pain caused by endometriosis - Spinal Cord Stimulation for Endometriosis pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON50815
Enrollment
15
Registered
2021-12-24
Start date
2022-06-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronische neuropathische pijn chronic pain endometriosis

Interventions

Implantation of a spinal cord stimulator with accompanying epidural leads (Boston Spectra Wavewriter System).

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients with endometriosis/ adenomyosis confirmed at surgery and without options for further surgical treatment. - Premenopausal woman aged >= 18 years - Patients with at least one of the endometriosis related pain symptoms: dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain or dyspareunia. - Mean pain NRS of at least 5 (scale 0-10). - The pain complaints are therapy resistant (including hormonal, medical and/or surgical options) - Refractory pain; Before neuromodulation patient has tried: Paracetamol, NSAIDs, Anti neuropathic pain therapy, TENS - Neurologic exam without marked motor deficit. - Meets all the inclusion criteria for the implantation of a neurostimulation system as typically utilized in the study center. - Subject has been screened by a multi-disciplinary panel including a psychologist and deemed suitable for implantation - Subject is able and willing to comply with the follow-up schedule and protocol - Subject is able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Female subject of childbearing potential is pregnant/nursing or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study - The presence of any malignancy - BMI >=35 - Subject currently has an active implantable device including ICD, pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator or intrathecal drug pump - Subject is unable to operate the device - Previous Neurostimulation therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean pain intensity and patients global impression of change at 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Mean pain: NRS pain score (3 times a day for 3 days) at baseline and 3-6 and 12 months post implant. • The number (percentage) of subjects who achieve a reduction in the pain intensity of at least 50%(substantial change) or 30% (moderately important change) at 6 months compared to baseline.(12) • Patient*s global impression of change(PGIC): dichotomous (better or improved versus not better or improved) at 3-6- and 12-months post implant. • Change in quality of life: EHP 30 & SF36 at baseline and at 6- and 12-months post implant. • Change in fatigue: EHP 30 at baseline and 6- and 12-months post implant • Pain Catastrophizing assessed with the PCS at baseline, 6- and 12-months post implant. • Central Sensitization Inventory at baseline and 6- and 12-months post implant. • Pain medication use at baseline 3- 6- and 12-months post implant • Lost working days: iPCQ Productivity Cost Questionnaire at baseline and at 6 months post implant • Number of patients with a failed trial SCS • Complications and side effects: 3, 6, and 12 months post implant.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)