Geen. NVT Online behavior sexual abuse
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Universiteit van Tilburg
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Sufficient knowledge and understanding of the Dutch language; Age 18 * 70 years old; Forensic psychiatric patients residing in the FPCs in the Netherlands or in Belgium; General population with no prior offenses.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: IQ under 70; Patients with acute psychosis; Insufficient knowledge and understanding of the Dutch language.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Study 1 (total of 197 items) 1. The Levenson Self Report Psychopathy scale; 26 items (LSRP; Levenson et al., 1995; Dutch translation: Uzieblo et al., 2006); 2. The Dutch Scale of Narcissism; 23 items (NNS; Ettema & Zondag, 2002); 3. The Severity Index of Personality Problems short form; 60 items (SIPP-SF; Verheul, 2006); 4. The Well-Being Questionnaire; 12 items (W-BQ12; Pouwer et al., 2000); 5. The Self Concept and Identity Measure; 27 items (SCIM; Kaufman et al., 2015). 6. Seksuele activiteiten op internet; 12 single items; 7. The Internet Sex Screening Test; 25 items (ISST; Delmonico & Miller, 2003); 8. The Cognitive and Emotional Congruence with Children; 12 items (C-ECWC; Paquette & McPhail, 2020). Study 2 (part 1; total of 262 items) 1. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 short form; 100 items (PID-5 SF; Maples et al., 2015; Dutch translation: Van der Heijden et al., 2014); 2. The UCLA Loneliness scale; 20 items (UCLA-3; Russell, 1996); 3. The Well-Being Questionnaire; 12 items (W-BQ12; Pouwer et al., 2000); 4. The Self Concept and Identity Measure; 27 items (SCIM; Kaufman et al., 2015). 5. The shortened version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; 16 items (DERS-16; Bjureberg et al., 2016); 6. The Utrechtse Coping Lijst; only used the subscales Active tackling, Passive reacting, and Avoiding; 22 items (UCL; Schreurs et al., 1988); 7. The Coping Using Sex Inventory; 16 items (CUSI; Cortoni & Marshall, 2001); 8. Seksuele activiteiten op internet; 12 single items; 9. The Internet Sex Screening Test; 25 items (ISST; Delmonico & Miller, 2003); 10. The Cognitive and Emotional Congruence with Children; 12 items (C-ECWC; Paquette & McPhail, 2020). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Study 2 (part 2). Both PMSA groups are asked to participate in an interview to deepen the received information of the self-report questionnaires and to gain insight into the motives and strategies of why and how people use the Internet to approach minors for sexual activities. The interviews are semi-structured using a topic list of general topics based on the literature and the findings of part 1. Follow-up questions depend on the input of the interviewees. Based on the saturation principle, the point when sufficient data is collected to answer the research question, no additional codes or issues are defined, and issues are fully understood without new insights (Hennink et al., 2017), the aim is to conduct 16 to 24 interviews. Study 2 (part 3). Forensic patients and their practitioners are asked to participate in longitudinal interviews (four times over 12 months) to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention program for these patients. They are interviewed using the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation (IFTE; Schuringa et al., 2014). An extra dimension is that we ask practitioners which crime-related risk factors and protective factors the treatment targets based on risk assessment information. Questions are presented per patient to measure changes in crime-related risk factors/protective factors. The number of patients and practitioners for the single case research is also between 16 and 24. | — |
Countries
Netherlands
Outcome results
None listed