Skip to content

The Dangle Study

The Dangle Study - DANGLE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON50700
Enrollment
130
Registered
2018-07-11
Start date
2018-10-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dangling of the free flap. Gravity training of the free flap.

Interventions

- No dangling protocol - Patients randomized in group A at the UMC Utrecht will undergo blood tests with the use of a Point Of Care Testing (POCT) device. Point of Care Testing is a technique that o

Sponsors

Plastisch chirurgie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Male or female - Age between 16 and 99 years old - Lower leg defect in need for a free flap reconstruction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Age under 16 years - Co-morbidities that prevent the patient from being able to undergo a dangling protocol - Insufficient Dutch language skills to understand the study - Mentally incompetent, Patients that are unable to give informed consent - Reconstruction with 2 or more free flaps - In case the patient is getting a secondary free flap due to partial or total free flap necrosis of the primary one.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary objective parameter: to assess whether a no dangling protocol is non-inferior to a dangling protocol in terms of proportion of patients who experienced partial flaps loss which did not require another free lap procedure at six months after surgery. We defined complete flap necrosis, partial flap necrosis (if a revision surgery with a second free flap is necessary) and lung embolia as major complications. Screening for lung embolia will only be performed if there is a clinical suspection for a lung embolia. Partial flap loss is defined as minor if no secondary free flap is needed or major if a secondary free flap was needed. Wound dehiscence, wound infection, failure of skin graft take on the free flap, and hematoma for which a surgical exploration was needed were defined as the minor complications.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary objective parameters: - We hypothesize that there will be no difference in major complications at 6 months. - We would like to objectify the gaseous changes within the free flap during the dangling protocol in a selective group of patients. - We will measure the physical functions at 3 and 6 months, 1 year, 1,5 years and 2 years with the PROMIS, EQ-5D and VAS-score questionnaires. - We hypothesize that there is no difference in the number of patients experiencing one or more minor complications at three and six months post operative. - Investigate if there is a difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups. - Investigate infection rates and osseous union rates with a follow up of two years based on the patients* medical files.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)