Comparison of a solid state versus balloon esophageal catheter for the estimation of pleural pressure in healthy subjects

Comparison of a solid state versus balloon esophageal catheter for the estimation of pleural pressure in healthy subjects - Comparison of a esophageal solid state versus balloon catheter

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON50537

Enrollment

Registered

2021-01-22

Start date

2021-08-27

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

N/A

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Signed informed consent Age * 18 year Healthy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy Upper airway/esophageal/mouth or face pathology (i.e. recent surgery, esophageal varices, diaphragmatic hernia) Nasal bleeding within the last

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The main study endpoint is the difference in Pes based derived parameters obtained by both types of esophageal catheters during each level of inspiratory loading and position. Pes will be measured as absolute value and relative value. Absolute values are Pes values at end-expiration and at peak inspiration (based on flow recordings), relative Pes is the difference between both absolute values (Pes swings).	—

Measure

Time frame

The main study endpoint is the difference in Pes based derived parameters obtained by both types of esophageal catheters during each level of inspiratory loading and position. Pes will be measured as absolute value and relative value. Absolute values are Pes values at end-expiration and at peak inspiration (based on flow recordings), relative Pes is the difference between both absolute values (Pes swings).

—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results