Skip to content

Optimizing Ankle Imaging in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Optimizing Ankle Imaging in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis - Ankle imaging in JIA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON50460
Enrollment
113
Registered
2016-10-14
Start date
2017-02-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Childhood Arthritis Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
2 Years to 17 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: * Clinically (suspected) active JIA with ankle involvement OR clinically inactive JIA / JIA patients in remission with ankle involvement attributed to JIA in the past * Scheduled to undergo MRI of the ankle * Written informed patients (when >12 years of age) and written informed parental consent. The parental consent of patients older than 16 years of age will become obsolete when the proposed amendment to the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO), which lowers the age limit of parental consent to 16 years, is adopted.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: * Age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
- To develop and validate a Juvenile Arthritis MRI Score (JAMRIS) for the ankle. - To develop and validate a US imaging protocol specified for the ankle affected by JIA

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- To evaluate the accuracy, validity, correlation, predictive value and responsiveness to change of optimized 3.0T MR imaging and ultrasound for the evaluation of disease activity in the ankle of patients with JIA, compared to the clinical examination as the reference standard. - To evaluate the differences and similarities of US and optimized 3.0T MRI between three clinical subgroups, defined as clinically active, inactive or remitting (see also under 4.1). - To assess the diagnostic accuracy of DWI in the evaluation of disease activity (synovitis) in JIA as compared to contrast-enhanced MRI as the reference standard. - To assess the diagnostic accuracy of UTE in the evaluation of tendinopathy compared to contrast-enhanced MRI as the reference standard. (researchprotocol pages 11, 12 &18)

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)