Skip to content

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Coronary Sinus Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Coronary Sinus Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. - LBB-SYNC trial

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON49994
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-01-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cardiomyopathy congestive heart failure

Interventions

Implantation of LBB electrode.

Sponsors

Catharina-ziekenhuis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Age 18+ -Ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF 90% right ventricular pacing from an existing pacemaker

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Existing biventricular pacing system - Permanent atrial fibrillation - AMI or CABG within the last three months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate for implantation of LBB electrode.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoints (LBB pacing versus biventricular pacing - calculated both as intention-to-treat and per-protocol): - Echocardiographic response after 6 months defined as decrease in left ventricular systolic diameter of >= 15% of baseline - Echocardiographic response assessed by chamber dimensions and LVEF on a continuous scale - Symptomatic response after 6 months defined as a fall in NYHA class of >= 1 - Improvement in well-being after 6 months defined as a decrease in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure score of >= 15% of baseline. - Shortening the duration of the QRS complex defined as the widest paced QRS complex rated at 12-lead ECG after 6 months. - Decline in NT-pro BNP value. - Device-related complications: *Periprocedural: CS/LBB electrode reoperation, pneumothorax, hemothorax, pericardial bleeding/tamponade. *One month postoperative: CS/LBB electrode reoperation, phrenic nerve stimulation, infection requiring extraction.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)