Skip to content

Intratumoral holmium microspheres brachytherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer; a single center, non-randomized, feasibility study in an open surgical setting- the SLOTH1 study

Intratumoral holmium microspheres brachytherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer; a single center, non-randomized, feasibility study in an open surgical setting- the SLOTH1 study - SLOTH-1

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON49772
Enrollment
6
Registered
2021-03-29
Start date
2021-12-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic cancer Pancreatic carcinoma

Interventions

Intratumoral injection of beta-minus (&beta
-) emitting holmium-166 poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres (166Ho-PLLA-MS, QuiremSpheres©) in a suspension of 0.9% NaCl and 0.1% Pluronic (phosphate buffer).

Sponsors

Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Female or male aged 18 years and over. 2. Diagnosis of primary borderline resectable pancreatic cancer by Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG) guidelines: 3. Patient is deemed eligible for surgical resection of the pancreatic cancer, however, during open surgery a more advanced disease than initially anticipated is found and resection is no longer feasible. 4. Life expectancy of 12 weeks or longer. 5. World Health Organisation (WHO) Performance status 0-1. 6. One or more measurable lesions of at least 10 mm in the longest diameter by spiral CT or MRI according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. 7. Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Radiation therapy within the last 4 weeks before the start of study therapy. 2. Calcifications in the pancreas or tumour that are highly expected to obstruct the needle tract 3. Any unresolved toxicity greater than National Cancer Institute (NCI), Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.0) grade 2 from previous anti-cancer therapy. 4. Serum bilirubin > 250 µmol/l 5. Leukocytes =2 within 3 months before entry, or presence of cardiac disease that in the opinion of the Investigator increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmia. 7. Patient is deemed ineligible for implantation of 166Ho by an expert panel (surgeon, nuclear medicine physician and researcher) due to tumour anatomy or nearby structures. 8. Pregnancy or breast feeding (women of child-bearing potential). 9. Patients suffering from psychic disorders that make a comprehensive judgement impossible, such as psychosis, hallucinations and/or depression. 10. Patients who are declared incompetent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The main endpoint is to establish the feasibility of intratumoral implantation of 166Ho-PLLA-MS by evaluating the average tumour absorbed dose in Gy calculated on SPECT. Microsphere distribution, absorbed dose and non-target absorbed dose are also analysed using MRI and CT. Additionally, safety, expressed in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0) events grade >= 3 deemed possibly, probably or definitely related to the implantation procedure or medical device implanted, is monitored. Tumor response is evaluated according to the RECIST 1.1 guidelines at 3 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Safety, expressed in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0) events grade >= 3 deemed possibly, probably or definitely related to the implantation procedure or medical device implanted. • To evaluate the average tumour absorbed dose in Gy calculated on MR images. • To evaluate the average tumour absorbed dose in Gy quantified using CT images • To evaluate the distribution of absorbed dose throughout the 3D target area (dose coverage). • To evaluate non-target dose deposition (within the pancreas and outside the pancreas). • To evaluate the implant efficiency. • To evaluate tumour response according to RECIST 1.1 at 3 months. • The implant experience using a questionnaire for the performing physician(s). • To evaluate radiation safety aspects for operators.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)