Skip to content

Dose REduction Strategy Study of TNF inhibitors in Psoriatic arthritis and axial Spondyloarthritis patients.

Dose REduction Strategy Study of TNF inhibitors in Psoriatic arthritis and axial Spondyloarthritis patients. - DRESS-PS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON49692
Enrollment
95
Registered
2018-09-13
Start date
2019-01-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

chronic inflammation of the joints Psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis

Interventions

The following T2T strategy will be adviced to rheumatologists: For patients allocated to the T2T strategy with tapering attempt group the TNFi dose will be reduced about one third by extending the i

Sponsors

Sint Maartenskliniek
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Eligible patients are >= 16 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form AND 1) have peripheral SpA of the psoriatic arthritis subtype diagnosed clinically by the rheumatologist , supported by the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) and/or 2) have axial SpA of the axial spondyloarthritis subtype, supported by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axSpA, AND - Are using full dose, or at least > 50% of the authorized defined daily dose (DDD), of an originator or biosimilar TNFi (adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab); - Patients have to have stable LDA, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Previous recorded unsuccessful dose reduction of TNFi in the previous 24 months, - Comorbidities expected to hamper successful dose reduction (e g Crohns disease, Ulcerative colitis, Psoriasis, Uveitis), - Not able to have 12 months follow-up (life expectancy, planned relocation), - Not able to measure outcome (language, other limitations)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The difference in proportion of patients between T2T strategy with or without tapering attempt who are in LDA state (PASDAS

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- To assess the proportion of patients in the intervention group able to reduce their TNFi dose, able to discontinue TNFi altogether, or not able to reduce TNFi dose without an increase in disease activity, respectively, - To compare the differences in efficacy between the intervention versus control group with TNFi measured by change in PASDAS and BSA of the skin and/or ASDAS at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up, - To assess the difference in the change from baseline in functioning measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI - axSpA only) between both groups with TNFi at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up, - To estimate cost-effectiveness ratio of the T2T strategy with tapering attempt of TNFi compared to the T2T strategy without tapering attempt, - To compare (dosage and) proportion of patients using NSAID, corticosteroid*s or cs/b/tsDMARDs between intervention and control group at 12 months follow up, - To predict in the intervention group which baseline factors (including [change in] serum drug levels and antidrug antibody levels) are associated with successful and maintained dose reduction, - To compare the difference in cumulative incidence of flare between the intervention and control group at 12 months follow up, - To assess the safety of this strategy with respect to proportion of patients developing adverse events with special attention to allergic (injection) reactions and infections

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)