Skip to content

A Phase 3b Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active Controlled Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib to Dupilumab in Adult Subjects with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

A Phase 3b Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active Controlled Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib to Dupilumab in Adult Subjects with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis. - M16-046

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON49672
Enrollment
24
Registered
2019-03-14
Start date
2019-11-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

atopic eczema eczema

Interventions

Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio and will receive upadacitinib or dupilumab and placebo until Week 24 visit: • Upadacitinib tablets + placebo pre-filled syringe
OR • Dupilumab + placebo tablet

Sponsors

Abbvie b.v.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Male or female subjects 18 between 75 years of age • Active moderate to severe atopic dermatitis defined by EASI, IGA, BSA, and pruritus • Candidate for systemic therapy or have recently required systemic therapy for atopic dermatitis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Prior exposure to any JAK inhibitor • Unable or unwilling to discontinue current AD treatments prior to the study • Requirement of prohibited medications during the study • Other active skin diseases or skin infections requiring systemic treatment or would interfere with appropriate assessment of atopic dermatitis lesions • Female subject who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or considering pregnancy during the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of subjects achieving a 75% reduction in Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI 75) at Week 16

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Percent change from baseline to Week 16 in Worst Pruritus NRS 2. Proportion of subjects achieving EASI 100 from baseline at Week 16 3. Proportion of subjects achieving EASI 90 from baseline at Week 16 4. Percent change from baseline to Week 4 in Worst Pruritus NRS 5. Proportion of subjects achieving EASI 75 from baseline at Week 2 6. Percent change from baseline to Week 1 in Worst Pruritus NRS

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)